Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 29[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 29, 2022.

Me Brain Hurts[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is an orphaned redirect now that the song title has been corrected to My Brain Hurts. No articles link here anymore. 23skidoo (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Closed operator[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 6#Closed operator

Greater Indonesia and Greater Malay[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 17:44, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The name of this concept appears to be either Greater Indonesia or Greater Malay. A new user tried to include both in the title but that's not the common practice in Wikipedia. This redirect has no use. Super Ψ Dro 12:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: The topics of Greater Indonesia and Greater Malay are inherently linked and are both addressed at the target page so I don't see it as an XY issue. TartarTorte 16:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then have a page titled Greater Indonesia and a redirect titled Greater Malay. They can be swapped if the latter is more common than the former. We don't have a World War II and Second World War redirect just because the war is commonly known by those two names. Super Ψ Dro 17:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's a fair point. I was looking at it more from an XY angle, but the point of this being an odd/implausible search term is valid. I'll strike my previous vote to now be weak delete. TartarTorte 19:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

198 (number)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no good reason for this to redirect to its current target (190 (number)) rather than being a red link (or, perhaps, not linked at all). PS. History shows it used to redirect to 190, 200 and even was an article, all versions were disputed without much discussion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. 190 (number) has some minimal information on 198. We would also need to check several complex navigation templates before making this the only number below about 274 which doesn't have either an article or a redirect at n (number). Certes (talk) 11:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is our standard convention for all numbers not notable enough for their own standalone article (as determined recently at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/198 (number)), but small enough to have a redirect target like this: redirect to a line in an article about their decade or century. There are many many more like this, for 264–268, 272, 274, 275, 278, 279, 282–287, etc. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pups Alone[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 03:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure this movie is notable. But with other cast members including Jennifer Love Hewitt, Malcolm McDowell and Keith David, there is no real reason this should exclusively be a redirect to Danny Trejo's page (which doesn't even mention the movie). So per WP:REDLINK this should probably be deleted. Nohomersryan (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It is unhelpful, useless and misleading to redirect a film page to a cast member, period. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 12:13, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unhelpful. Probably a future article as well --Lenticel (talk) 03:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and should WP:REDLINK. Skynxnex (talk) 03:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_29&oldid=1096838883"