Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 2, 2022.

English Clasico[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find reliable independent secondary sources asserting this particular rivalry to be the English Clasico. Iseult Δx parlez moi 16:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:18, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Extreme porn[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) | never forget 02:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a very specific target for a rather generic pair of terms. I don't think these should necessarily be deleted, but there must be a broader target, perhaps to a subsection to be added to Pornography. BD2412 T 05:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both - "Extreme" is too vague of a descriptive label here. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The Act defines "extreme pornographic image" as something distinct from Obscenity at common law, so the expression is an official term of art in UK obscenity legislation. I don't have an opinion on whether this makes it worth a Wikipedia redirect. Tevildo (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Pornography#Classification mentions "extreme" fetishism, so I think there is something that exists as a genre, which is probably distinct from what the statute recognizes as an issue. BD2412 T 18:51, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep both - "Extreme pornography" is specific terminology used in UK law and the most likely search words used to find the legislation. The title for the article about the legislation doesn't mention extreme pornography so will be hard to find without the redirect. IndigoBeach (talk) 19:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:17, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I think these are plausible search terms for the subject. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:36, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Extreme cold[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:07, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are kinds of extreme cold that are not particularly "weather" related, e.g., Absolute zero. Perhaps disambiguate in some way. BD2412 T 05:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - It seems better to just let people search. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 19:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't trust the search function to provide the best results. BD2412 T 19:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      +1 to not trusting search, comfortable with a dab, unlike extreme heat, extreme cold is used far less often in weather usages, Sadads (talk) 22:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:17, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Extreme heat[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. ✗plicit 02:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are kinds of extreme heat that are not particularly related to a "heat wave", e.g., the temperatures inside stars, and temperatures achieved in various manufacturing activities and experiments. Perhaps disambiguate in some way. BD2412 T 05:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think there should be something, minimally, linking to extreme heat -- having added a bunch of links through this redirect: much of it is weather related, Sadads (talk) 22:54, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 06:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:17, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I think this is a plausible search term. Yes, extreme heat can refer to the inside of stars etc., but as a phrase it is usually used to describe the weather. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:39, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tiquan Forbes[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 13#Tiquan Forbes

West England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the map on the article, this looks like too narrow of a target for this redirect. feminist (talk) Слава Україні! 04:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The hatnote indicates a retarget to West Country is in order. However, I would like someone from the UK to check the appropriateness of that; I am unsure whether further north and less westward parts of England are also included in such a definition. Bundled in West England, which targets the same place. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I created the redirect Western England to fix a redlink in Phonological history of English close front vowels - diff. It's in use there and in History of Wales. The "phonology" article distinguishes between Southern England and Western England. The lead of Southern England says that it includes the West Country (roughly, southwest England below the Severn). Western England is therefore different from the West Country, and retargetting there would be very wrong. The "history" article is talking about the area of England east of modern Wales, north of the Severn.
I agree that the current target is wrong (and I can't think why I pointed Western England there): West of England is a modern regional authority within the West Country. Retarget both to West Midlands (region), which is broadly the part of England immediately east of Wales. Narky Blert (talk) 07:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both as too vague and too ambiguous to be useful and unlink from, or repipe, the articles it appears in. Neither term, as far as I know, has ever had anything approaching a specific meaning. SpinningSpark 12:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:33, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Delete The current redirect to West of England is just wrong. The West of England is just a rebranded name for the former county of Avon and part of Western England rather than the whole, so is an inappropriate redirect. West Country would be a better redirect but as others have pointed Western England or West England could refer to more northernly areas of Western England as well. Eopsid (talk) 17:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the talk pages of West Country and West Midlands (region), apart from Geography of England, North and South West England, and hoping for more participation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both - neither terms have been well-defined in reliable sources and any redirection to other articles on areas smaller than the entire Western half of England will create more confusion for readers than search results. SamWilson989 (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Indianapolis explosion[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not the only "Indianapolis explosion": see 1963 Indiana State Fairgrounds Coliseum gas explosion. Steel1943 (talk) 21:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Setindexify per 65.92.246.142. Veverve (talk) 06:56, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; it is not appropriate to setindexify since the connection between the term and the articles is so tenuous (note there is no New York explosion, nor similar). UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:19, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One final try. Should this be setindexified?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as an ambiguous term that isn't worthy of a set index per UnitedStatesian: few if any of the explosions that could conceivably be listed as a set index are referred to as 'Indianapolis explosion'. Best to just leave this as a search term. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per UnitedStatesian's points. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Surf beach[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Surf beach

Mindanao State University - Marawi (main)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term. Double disambiguated with both dash and bracket forms of disambiguation, and "main" is not used by the subject as a disambiguator. The article content in the page history is just an unattributed copy of Mindanao State University. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Diva (main)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see what "main" is supposed to mean in this context or why it's a useful disambiguator for this topic. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The page history and logs offer no illumination for the purpose of this redirect from 2005. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as confusing --Lenticel (talk) 09:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Broward County John Doe (1979)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to a page where there is no mention of this topic. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Minho(main character in The Maze Runner Trilogy)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spacing error between the title and the disamiguator, capitalisation error (Trilogy should be lowercase), disambiguator is too long to be a reasonable search term - delete 192.76.8.78 (talk) 17:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. As a person unfamiliar with the book, I wouldn't guess that there is another Minho in the series. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 08:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Green Book (Tibetan document))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yet more useless WP:UNNATURAL disambiguation errors with doubled brackets. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Harvester (butterfly))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another batch of redirects with malformed double bracket disambiguators. Delete per WP:UNNATURAL. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sliders, Part One (Sliders episode))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another batch of redirects with erroneous double bracket disambiguators. Delete per WP:UNNATURAL 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ring system of (136108)) Haumea[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Procedural Close. Redirects have been moved to correctly bracketed titles so the nominated titles no longer exist. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirects, doubled brackets on the numeric identifier. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • 192.76.8.78, Moved as page creator to correct titles, and updated above (this RFD might need to be closed) Qwerfjkltalk 18:15, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Qwerfjkl I reverted your rewrite of my RFD nomination [1] per WP:TPO because your changes completely altered the meaning of the nomination and meant my nomination statement didn't make sense. Since these redirects no longer exist I'll close this. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 18:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Modern Love (song))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More redirects with malformed double bracket disambiguators, delete per WP:UNNATURAL 192.76.8.78 (talk) 15:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2008 Grand Finale (Grand Finale (V8 Supercars))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous, implausible and useless redirect - Nested disambiguators and pointlessly disambiguating "2008 Grand Finale" with "Grand Finale". Completely implausible search term. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 15:50, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Why would "V8 Supercars" be a disambiguator for "Grand Finale" as a disambiguator for "2008 Grand Finale"? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:23, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Needlessly redundant redundancy to this redirect that makes it both implausible as a search term or as something someone would want to link to from another article. "2008 Grand Finale (V8 Supercars)" or the naturalistic "2008 V8 Supercars Grand Finale" would both be more reasonable redirects. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 15:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gio (Gio (singer))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Completely implausible and useless redirect - Nested disambiguators, title of the redirect is diambiguated by the title of the article, dismbiguating a word with itself etc. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 15:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete With the double bracket etc this looks very implausible. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete due to malformed modifier --Lenticel (talk) 02:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sin Tí (Yolandita Monge song))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another batch of redirects with malformed disambiguators, i.e. double closing brackets. Delete per WP:UNNATURAL. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 15:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Margaret of France (1553–1615))[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another batch of redirects from titles with malformed disambiguators. These all have doubled closing brackets and as such are implausible search terms that should be deleted per WP:UNNATURAL. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom, broken parentheticals that serve no purposee. eviolite (talk) 15:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All of these had a spike in views last Nov, not really sure why, but still delete all. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The Celivarone article was at the malformed title for several months before being fixed, so there is always the chance that deletion could break external links. The others were either momentarily at the malformed title, were the result of a duplicate article that was redirected (Atomic Kitten; should have been speedy deleted), or was just a redirect to begin with. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all due to malformed modifier --Lenticel (talk) 02:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cupid.27s Chokehold[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strange sort of not quite percent encoded title. For context - you cannot use apostrophes in URLs for technical reasons so they have to be escaped as "%27". ".27" is complete nonsesnse though and isn't used in any kind of encoding scheme. This isn't a plausible redirect as this is essentially a redirect from a broken URL, someone copying and pasting from the adress bar isn't going to come across this. The correctly encoded Cupid's Chokehold cannot be created as it is the same page as Cupid's Chokehold. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 14:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The period-encoding is a real thing, but only an ancient MediaWiki quirk; I couldn't really find documentation for it but mw:Manual:$wgFragmentMode has some info. Essentially, period-encoding used to be done for special characters inside anchors. This use still technically works (for example I can link to Main Page#From today.27s featured article) but isn't standard anymore (and would never be relevant for the title of a full page rather than just an anchor link.) eviolite (talk) 15:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete @Eviolite has an interesting point, but it shouldn't matter anymore. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

R&B/Gospel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:XY. This redirect combines two genes of music together giving it no clear target, Rhythm and blues and Gospel. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 13:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oklahoma festival shooting[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a redirect left over from a page move to an article that I have redirected to List of mass shootings in the United States in 2022. Unlike the other page move redirects from this article's history, this one in particular doesn't make sense to retarget to the list page as it has no year disambiguator, and statistically speaking it's likely that this incident was not the only shooting to have taken place at a festival in Oklahoma, making it a vague and ambiguous title. There are no incoming links to worry about. ansh.666 02:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I cannot rule out if there was another mass shooting in a different year at a festival in Oklahoma. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cache in general[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that "foo in general"→"foo" redirects are particularly helpful from a searching perspective, the title is more of a sentence fragment rather than a topic. The target here is also not a "general" article, if this is kept it should be retargeted. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 01:15, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This redirect is the result of an old unsourced dictionary definition-like stub that was blanked and redirected and would undoubtedly not be kept or merged if brought to Afd. The most appropriate target would seem to be Cache (archaeology), or perhaps Cache (biology), but the term is vague and if kept should probably target the dab page at Cache. But, I agree we should not have 'Foo in general' redirects, so delete (soft delete per my previous comments). Mdewman6 (talk) 01:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I find confusing --Lenticel (talk) 02:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hip- hop music[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inplausible/WP:UNNATURAL spacing errors. See also the recent nomination at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 13#Hip- hop which resulted in one of these being deleted. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 01:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Spaces around hyphens in compound words (such as Hip - hop) is already implausible enough, and asymmetric spacing is doubly so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DElete Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Čanada[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to my searches this is either the Slovak(?) name for Canada, in which case it should be deleted per WP:RLOTE, or it's the creator sticking random accents on words again, in which case it should be deleted as nonsense. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 00:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as nonsense. The Slovak name for Canada starts with a "K" (see sk:Kanada); Č is pronounced like "ch" in "chocolate", i.e. "Chanada". From wikidata:Q16 and wikt:Canada#Translations I do not see any language which uses this letter in their name for Canada. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Faux Slovak-or-whatever writing isn't really helpful to anyone in čases like this. Regards, SONIČ678 16:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per anon's findings --Lenticel (talk) 08:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Far too old to be R3-speedied but it fits as an implausible typo. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

"John"[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 02:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Textbook example of an WP:UNNATURAL title modification. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 00:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, disambiguates works often referred to with quote marks. See previous RfD. J947 † edits 22:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per prev RfD. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ángel (Akon song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can find no evidence that this song has ever been titled with an accent in English. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 00:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blueäs Clues[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A batch of redirects from titles that have had their apostrophes replaced with ä's. No idea what these are supposed to be about, creator was CIR blocked in part for making weird redirects. The last one also has a spelling mistake in it. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 00:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_2&oldid=1109731582"