Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 11[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 11, 2022.

Sacramento State green[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Spring green#Sacramento State green. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 05:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, and could not find a good place to retarget this redirect amongst articles related to California State University, Sacramento. Steel1943 (talk) 22:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pine green[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Shades of cyan#Pine green since it is mentioned there. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 05:34, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target article, but Pine green is a {{R with history}}. Steel1943 (talk) 22:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Moss green[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 18#Moss green

Deltacoronavirus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. This is a move request per WP:PRECISE and not an RfD. Move request is at Talk:Deltacoronavirus (genus)#Requested move 11 August 2022. (non-admin closure) TartarTorte 21:58, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While I do believe that SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant is the primary target for Delta coronavirus, I think that without the space such as Deltacoronavirus, targeting directly to the Deltacoronavirus (genus) makes sense, especially with the current hat-note. TartarTorte 18:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TartarTorte: This would technically be a move request since Deltacoronavirus (genus) would move to Deltacoronavirus per WP:PRECISE. Steel1943 (talk) 20:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
trout Self-trout I am 99% sure I've told someone here that they've used the WP:WRONGVENUE for a move request at RfD, and here I go doing so anyways. Cheers @Steel1943! Turning it into an WP:RM now. TartarTorte 21:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Niskaram[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:26, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, although "namaskaram" is listed as a varient. MB 17:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete it seems to share the same root word as Namaste according to this article [1]. However, it doesn't mean that it is a synonym for the term and is instead a term for "prayer". --Lenticel (talk) 04:52, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Latina (song)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 18#Latina (song)

.rp[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:13, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While RP can refer to Poland's full, formal name, Rzeczpospolita Polska, .rp does not appear to actually used for Polish websites, and it does not show up at List of Internet top-level domains. Delete unless evidence of use can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 15:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Forgive my laughter[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 18#Forgive my laughter

-mancy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mancy due to it containing more helpful pointers. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 13:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not specifically mentioned at target. Maybe a soft redirect to its Wiktionary entry (Wikt:-mancy) would be more suitable? CycloneYoris talk! 08:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Does Wikipedia have many other redirects based on partial search terms or morphemes? Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary, it's a bit strange to have redirects for random affixes and morphemes, so I'd lean towards soft redirect to Wiktionary.
Since the disambiguation page exists and links to the Wiktionary entry a retarget to that page could also work, but honestly I'm not convinced that disambiguation page should exist in the first place. There's only one other target listed and "mancy" on its own is rarely used in reference to divination except perhaps as an informal term in some fringe communities; under these circumstances, disambiguation seems like a stretch. – Scyrme (talk) 19:54, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Mancy (disambiguation) per 64.229.88.43, who has also enhanced the dab today with multiple entries. Jay 💬 10:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Amir Ben Shimon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep and restored article at Amir Ben-Shimon, without prejudice to AfD. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:29, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Circular redirect. The other one is at Amir Ben-Shimon. scope_creepTalk 07:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget both to F.C. Kafr Qasim#Current squad - Subject is an Israeli footballer who plays for F.C. Kafr Qasim. If no biographical article exists, then redirecting to the club he plays for seems best; he is mentioned at that article. – Scyrme (talk) 08:54, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The former was briefly an article because of an attempted cut-and-paste move from the latter. If we're going to reinstate one, it should be Amir Ben-Shimon, which was an article until the nominator created the circular redirect they noted in the nomination. - Eureka Lott 15:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring Amir Ben-Shimon and having Amir Ben Shimon has a redirect works for me. TartarTorte 17:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

塔罗牌[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:32, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RLOTE. No particular affinity between Tarot and the Chinese language. CycloneYoris talk! 07:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per CycloneYoris. 99.99% of readers won't be able to decipher it and, if they can, they should be on the relevant language Wiki. Bermicourt (talk) 07:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the article doesn’t even mention China so there is no evidence of a significant association.--67.70.24.37 (talk) 17:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: There's no greater inherent association between Tarot and its name in Chinese than in any other language, especially as it is not mentioned in the article. Delete per WP:RLOTE. TartarTorte 22:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Retarget to Hong_Kong_Cantonese#From_English Where it is mentioned but I'm also fine with deletion. --Lenticel (talk) 02:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator. Oppose retargeting to Hong Kong Cantonese since this term is used in all varieties of Chinese, and in any case Hong Kong Cantonese is generally not written in simplified Chinese. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 03:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Quartz (magazine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 06:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that Quartz is an online magazine, and it doesn't publish a printed magazine either. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vaanku[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 18#Vaanku

6100s[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:25, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how this is useful, one particular future century. MB 04:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: There are more than 500 redirects from future years and ranges.[2] PrimeHunter (talk) 06:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I think the vast majority of these redirects created by DerekSquared, where nothing is mentioned about the specific century/decade/year, should be deleted. In this particular case there is nothing in the target about the 6100s so this is an unsuitable redirect. A7V2 (talk) 07:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I know which ones will be tackled next. Most likely the decades, a number of which are leftover from when we had separate articles covering the 4th–10th millenia. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for having no apparent use. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Asparagus (color)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Shades of chartreuse#Asparagus. signed, Rosguill talk 17:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target article, and doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere else on Wikipedia either. I'm assuming the subject of these redirects was at the target article at some point, but if it was, it seems it was over at least a year ago. In addition, Asparagus (color) is a {{R with history}}. Steel1943 (talk) 22:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • It probably was once in the target. This smells like yet another stupid move of content (see #Army green below) but I'm tired of doing the hard work of trawling through the history to find out what happened to it. I vote to put it back from wherever it was moved to. SpinningSpark 14:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Regarding the history, Asparagus (color) was an unreferenced stub until it was overwritten as a redirect by a revision on 03:10, 6 March 2008 by Wrad. Looking at Shades of green, it appears multiple articles were merged to that destination around 6 and 7 March 2008 by Wrad and PaleAqua. (See Talk:Shades of green § The Plan) The material remained there and by around 2017 it was no longer unreferenced.

However, on 6 February 2021 ThunderBrine thoroughly reorganised the article, deleting much of its content including the material originating with Asparagus (color). I don't know if these changes were discussed anywhere (they don't appear to have been discussed at Talk:Shades of green), and no edit summaries were given. It does not appear that the material was moved anywhere; rather, it seems it was deleted, so there's nothing to "put back" unless we recover it from an old revision. I'm not sure what the reasons were for cutting some entries (like 'asparagus green') while leaving others in. – Scyrme (talk) 00:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ThunderBrine: What do you think about this redirect? Your opinion may be helpful, since you've been editing Shades of chartreuse lately and were the one who deleted the material that was moved to Shades of green. If you moved the material rather than deleting it, where did you move it? – Scyrme (talk) 00:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If they were in shades of green page, I most likely moved colors to chartreuse or spring green, based on HSV/HSL, which is the modern tool used for classification of color. I would have moved shades of green to the yellow and cyan color families if the colors were drastically inaccurate to their color family. (it was usually shades of dark yellow or dark cyan; those two subfamilies were often mistakenly put in the green family. People to this day still think of olive as a shade of dark green rather than dark chartreuse or dark yellow.) ThunderBrine (talk) 22:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ThunderBrine: I don't see "asparagus" listed at any of those destinations. If it helps you remember what happened, here's a link to what the content was: revision 1000906644#Asparagus. – Scyrme (talk) 04:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Asparagus" has a HSV/HSL hue of 93°, so it should appear in Shades of chartreuse rather than any other color page. If it doesn't, I wonder if someone changed it sometime recently as to not being in the chartreuse/"yellow-green" family. ThunderBrine (talk) 12:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You had added it but without attribution, and it was copied content, which is why it was removed. Jay 💬 13:41, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nguyen Ngọc Tho[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#Nguyen Ngọc Tho

Verdi Competition[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While named for Verdi, it does not appear in the target article. TartarTorte 00:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:REDLINK. It seems to be a notable international competition and I've seen some potential references that say this is one of the first steps to becoming a musical virtuoso. I think someone more versed in classical music might be able to create an article out of this. --Lenticel (talk) 03:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to encourage article creation. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:42, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_11&oldid=1180592160"