Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 4[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 4, 2021.

2021 United States Capitol protests[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 16:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably point the same place, let's decide which one it should be. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • "inauguration week protests" makes most sense to me Feoffer (talk) 22:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • First off, let's note that there's a viable WP:SMALLDETAILS argument here, but I would oppose that, because the Capitol is still a kind of capitol. Furthermore, there's the fact that lots of people don't know the difference between a capital and a capitol. Now, for most people, I think the first thing they think of when they hear these terms is the protest leading up to the storming of the Capitol. However, our article on the storming of the Capitol primarily concerns, well, the storming of the Capitol. We could refine and retarget, respectively, to 2021 United States Capitol attack § March to the Capitol, but that's just two paragraphs, because, despite the enduring image of Trump et al.'s rally at the Ellipse, there really isn't that much to say about the "peaceful protest" part of the day. At the same time, the inauguration protests article is largely about state capitols. Thus, I think the best solution here is a DAB page that covers protests at both the Capitol and state capitols at the lowercase-c version of this title, listing, The 2021 United States Capitol attack, which occurred after a brief protest, The 2020–21 United States election protests, some of which took place at state capitols on the same day as the U.S. Capitol attack, and The 2021 United States inauguration week protests, which occurred at state capitols. And 2021 isn't yet halfway through. There's a good chance there will be more Capitol protests, by some movement or another, before it's over. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 23:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree that it should be a disambig page. ✌️ The owner of all 🗸 23:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Synchronise. I don't have a strong opinion about the best target, but I do strongly believe that both redirects should target the same place. WP:SMALLDIFFS should be avoided unless the differences are very clear and in this case they are not. Thryduulf (talk) 14:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify per tamzin. Topics are related enough for a dab, and there's still plenty of 2021 left for even more possible topics. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 01:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Faruqui[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G8 - the target has been deleted. Thryduulf (talk) 14:06, 7 June 2021 (UTC) The target page and this redirect have been undeleted, but the target is now being discussed at AfD. I'm reclosing this as procedural keep as there is no point discussing the redirect until the AfD has concluded. Thryduulf (talk) 20:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same as the previous one Jogesh 69 (talk) 21:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wait. The target is currently tagged for G4 speedy deletion; if it's deleted, this redirect will be speedily deleted per G8. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 21:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move Faruqui (surname) back to the base title. The disambiguator isn't needed. - Eureka Lott 23:53, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Munawar[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G8. Thryduulf (talk) 14:07, 7 June 2021 (UTC) The target page and this redirect have been undeleted, but the target is now being discussed at AfD. I'm reclosing this as procedural keep as there is no point discussing the redirect until the AfD has concluded. Thryduulf (talk) 20:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is baseless redirection, he set the articles first name and second name separetely as the redirect page. Another page is Faruqui. Jogesh 69 (talk) 20:52, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wait. The target is currently tagged for G4 speedy deletion; if it's deleted, this redirect will be speedily deleted per G8. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 21:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

U$C[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 12#U$C

Nuclear tektite[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This phrase makes no sense. It appears to be an attempt to create a term for nuclear melt glass. However, tektites are natural by definition; trinitite, meanwhile, is a bad target anyway since it refers to one specific well-documented example of a nuclear melt glass. Google didn't produce any evidence this phrase is actually used: search results. It is worth noting the info in trinitite#Nuclear forensics stating that pre-2010 it was assumed that nuclear melt glasses were all pretty similar, but this is now known to be categorically false; here is how the article looked in Jan 2021 before I expanded it, in 2013 when the redirect was created, and 2010 (the year we realised just how varied nuclear melt glass actually is). 92.24.246.11 (talk) 17:26, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not a valid search term. Virtually no usage outside wikipedia generated ones. Conceptally. as noted above conflates two separate items. --Bejnar (talk) 17:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

La La La La La[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Had redirected to Around the World (La La La La La) which is the only article in the dab using the exact phrase "La La La La La". I think that is sufficient to make it the PT. The hatnote there links to the dab to alert the reader if that is not what that are looking for. MB 17:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • A Google search suggests that this term does not distinctively refer to this song. A song might have more than five Las, in which case this would be part of its refrain. It might have fewer, but have them repeated ("La la la / La la la"). Someone typing in "La La La La La" could be looking for any sort of song with lots of "la"s in it. Thus, keep. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 23:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The refrain of "La-La-La-Lies" is "La la la la la la lies", but who's counting? Also, the part of a song title in parentheses is intended to distinguish it from other songs of the same name, not necessarily to be itself distinctive; see e.g. La La La (If I Had You)" on the DAB page - and IMO any number of repeated "la"s is not distinctive. Narky Blert (talk) 09:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The disambiguation page deals with 3 or more Las. I do not agree that Around the World (La La La La La) is the primary topic for "La La La La La". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:36, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dominica national under-17 football team[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Should delete to encourage article creation Joseph2302 (talk) 14:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:36, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 11:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete well stated by nominator. No target, is no target. --Bejnar (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trinidad and Tobago national under-15 football team[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:10, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, and should be deleted to encourage possible article creation. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:36, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 11:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete well stated by nominator. No target, is no target. --Bejnar (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Glass parking lot[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget Glass crater and soft redirect the other two. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 16:07, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not currently mentioned at the target page and not really suitable to properly cover the term there. Appears to have once been an article. Not sure where this should go or what should happen to it. (There's also Glass Parking Lot but the instructions for listing multiple redirects make precisely zero sense to me.) 92.24.246.11 (talk) 12:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Trinitite has sections on nuclear forensics, cultural impact, and similar materials. Impact glass redirects to Impactite and might be more suited for glass crater as with Darwin glass AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 13:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Impactites are natural, formed by meteorite impacts, not nuclear weapons. Trinitite is one specific form of nuclear melt glass; these phrases seem to refer to nuclear melt glass in general. Trouble is, we don't have a general article, nor do we have even an article for melt glass of any variety. 92.24.246.11 (talk) 13:51, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There's Vitrified sand. Would that work? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 13:54, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's a good possibility, yeah. 92.24.246.11 (talk) 13:58, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget glass crater to vitrified sand, AngusWOOF's suggestion, as the broader, more apt target. I agree that (1) and (2) glass parking lots should go as soft redirects to Wiktionary, per PEIsquirrel (Ivanvector's squirrel) and 92.24.246.11. --Bejnar (talk) 17:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tired all the time syndrome[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 11#Tired all the time syndrome

Draft:Untitled Okoye series[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prematurely created draft article for a project thought to be one thing (a new series for the character Okoye from Black Panther) but has since been made a redirect to the Wakanda series, which has been confirmed to be what the actress will play the character in. Not many (if any) viewers will be looking for this with the series known to be the latter and given it is a draft. Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:09, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Deadline's report doesn't specifically confirm that it is for an Okoye series, just that it's for an "origin spinoff series". /Film also notes it is uncertain. Best to just have this redirect deleted and note the info on the Wakanda series draft. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:24, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as it helps focus on the single draft for the upcoming TV series that is related to Wakanda, Okoye, Black Panther, and so forth. If there are multiple relevant TV series then the names will be fleshed out. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 13:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • AngusWOOF That is what the Untitled Wakanda draft is doing. A user pre-maturely created the Okoye draft when it was unknown if it was independent of the previously announced Wakanda series. Sources have since confirmed they are one in the same, so the Okoye draft name is a mute point. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:06, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I think AngusWOOF and Tamzin detail things pretty well. Draft redirects are editor focused (no one is likely to be searching draftspace for anything) this is helpful in centralising people's efforts, and it has the added benefit of preserving attribution should there be anything in the redirect's history worth merging in. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 01:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dōngjīng (Japan)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 11#Dōngjīng (Japan)

Nessa Barrett[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:18, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barrett's been covered in the media for a number of things other than this one collaboration. While she's probably not (yet) notable enough for an article, meaning that WP:REDLINK doesn't quite apply, this redirect is surprising for any reader looking her up in a context other than the song. (The song's title, La Di Die, redirects to Jxdn, which I think is reasonable, although I'm gonna refine the section.) Delete for lack of a logical target. The search results, listing a number of articles that mention her (including the current target), will be far more helpful to our readers. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 01:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep until someone makes a proper Nessa Barrett page. Unless another page has sufficient information on her, and according to the nominator she doesn’t, keeping her as a redirect to Jxdn where there is coverage is the most appropriate course of action. If as the nominator mentioned, Barrett has had media coverage for other things, I think the most appropriate course of action is to keep the redirect until someone takes that media coverage and turns it into an article. However, the majority of recent headlines appear to also be about Jxdn so I don’t think the redirect is a surprise. She’s not a non-notable entity so deleting the page wouldn’t make sense. And it is completely normal for an artist whose biggest claim to fame is a collaboration with another artist to redirect to the other artist’s discography page if the song itself doesn’t have a page. That’s what is happening here. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 01:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or create article - Keep, or create article. The majority of recent headlines involving Barrett appear to also be about Jxdn. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to encourage article creation, because in the meantime this redirect impedes Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now as useful for redirecting La Di Die traffic. When La Di Die is big enough on its own then it can redirect there. Same with Barrett's career (multiple charting singles). AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:08, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Barrett also worked on "I'm Dead" with Jxdn. --Jax 0677 (talk) 08:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Syrian Orthodox Church & Orthodox Syrian Church[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 14#Syrian Orthodox Church & Orthodox Syrian Church

Aidin[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 11#Aidin

Hitesh Makhija[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 01:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, an internet search suggests that they are a not-yet-notable actor. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 15:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Mentioned or not, there's no point in a redirect from an actor's name to the article about one film where he's had a minor role. – Uanfala (talk) 13:11, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete apparently Hitesh Makhija does play a role in the Indian soap opera Shaadi Mubarak, but finding a reliable independent source for that seems to be difficult. Absent a reliable source to add him back into the Shaadi Mubarak article, this redirect should be deleted, as "no target". --Bejnar (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_June_4&oldid=1028477995"