Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 7[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 7, 2021.

Beautiful Woman at Le Vrai[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 15#Beautiful Woman at Le Vrai

Le Vrai[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target. Le Vrai ("the truth") is a common French phrase, but there's no other obvious target, and the only mention in relation to The Matrix seems to be in Tory Mussett, which wouldn't be a useful target. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mega City (The Matrix)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 15#Mega City (The Matrix)

The Zion Archive[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target; the only mention in the encyclopaedia seems to be in The Animatrix, which lacks any context and wouldn't be a suitable target. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - could cause confusion as there appears to be many archives with similar names relating to Zionism/Judaism, etc. A7V2 (talk) 00:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Turings all the way down[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speeedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 00:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target or any other article. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why I created this, uh, twelve years ago. Feel free to delete. —JeremyBanksTalk 21:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

L. Heath[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Heath (name)#L. signed, Rosguill talk 18:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bryan (MCC cricketer)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Jack Bryan. signed, Rosguill talk 18:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. According to List of Marylebone Cricket Club players (1919–1939), Jack Bryan played for MCC; however, this is not mentioned in the article. https://cricketarchive.com/Archive/Players/28/28247/all_teams.html does list the Marylebone Cricket Club, but not in the "main clubs", and it also lists quite a few other clubs, so I don't think this is a useful disambiguator. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Jack Bryan who presumably played FC cricket for MCC in 1924–25. A reader searching up Bryan (MCC cricketer) will be best served by a redirect to Jack Bryan, thus we should provide such a redirect. Arguably ambiguous with Bryan Valentine, but only arguably. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Campbell (Fast v Slow cricketer)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Although there are quite a few cricketers named Campbell on Wikipedia, none of them seems to have played for Fast vs Slow. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ask me about my wiener[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Google tells me this is a quote from the film. The quote is not discussed in the article. Only one pageview has been recorded in the past 90 days. The redirect should be deleted. Un assiolo (talk) 15:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Average pageviews for the last year indicate two views per month. If it is indeed a quote from the film then it is a relevant redirect and per WP:CHEAP should be kept. Polyamorph (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Enwiki has nothing about "Ask me about my wiener". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Thomas the dank engine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 12:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect from what seems to be a long dead meme to the Thomas the Tank Engine article. The meme is not mentioned in the target article or anywhere else on Wikipedia. I have been unable to find any reliable sources discussing this meme, all the results I turned up were homemade songs on youtube and the like from about 2 years ago, and I feel that adding a section to the target article would be WP:UNDUE. It does however get a small amount of pageviews (~10/month), so if a suitable target can be found it might be better to retarget it. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Can't really see anyone serious not using Thomas the Tank instead; though I suppose some could be looking for the meme ... or the hits could be from bots. delete anyway.Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Djm-leighpark is right, it's a dead meme, and the redirect was made as a joke. Plutonical (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

True Trans Soul Rebel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Transgender Dysphoria Blues. signed, Rosguill talk 18:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems strange to me that this redirect (the title of a song on the album Transgender Dysphoria Blues) targets an EP that only contains an acoustic version and not the original song. It's an odd situation, because the listing on the album page and some of the templates seem to regard "True Trans" as being a single release of the song, whereas the actual situation seems to be that it is in fact an acoustic EP of which the acoustic version of "True Trans Soul Rebel" is only one listing. I kind of want to retarget it back to Transgender Dysphoria Blues for the original song listing rather than the acoustic, but I'm listing it here for comment in case there is some domain-specific policy or etiquette I don't know about, and also because I'm confused by the dual Single/EP treatment that different parts of the article use. Not sure what is standard in WP:SONGS or whatever the relevant editor group would be. BlackholeWA (talk) 13:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Frycook of The Chum Bucket[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There does not seem to be a character or location by this name in the Spongebob SquarePants setting, and it is not mentioned in the target article. Based on the short lived article in the page history it seems to be a reference to episode 39b from season 2, but it's not the real name of that episode or any characters in that episode either 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_February_7&oldid=1006925555"