Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 24[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 24, 2021.

Template:Br[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 9#Template:Br

UNSC Marine Corps Troops[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 1#UNSC Marine Corps Troops

长沙地铁1号线[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 23:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible foreign-language redirect. Numbered and lettered train lines IMHO do not make plausible redirects in foreign languages. This will just cause more confusion to those who do not realize they are searching the English Wikipedia from the wikipedia.org home page. Aasim (talk) 19:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:RFOREIGN. These appear to be valid native-language names for the targets. - Eureka Lott 19:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep it is highly likely that people searching for English language information on a foreign topic that has a native non-English name would search using those terms -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 19:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Army of twenty million[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 1#Army of twenty million

Fascism in Thailand[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 31#Fascism in Thailand

Theological definition (Catholicism)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 31#Theological definition (Catholicism)

Dogmatically define[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 1#Dogmatically define

Theological definition[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 1#Theological definition

Digital bank[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 31#Digital bank

Draft:Move/Antonia (kidnapped by pirates)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Speedy deleted as a broken redirect, CSD G8. Liz Read! Talk! 18:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC) Liz Read! Talk! 18:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect created to fix a mess I made after a misunderstanding later clarified by another user to me. Discussion is here. I am also the only contributor to this redirect and it is recent so that's a reason by itself. Super Ψ Dro 14:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

China COVID-19 cover-up allegations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Chinese government response to COVID-19. (non-admin closure) Politrukki (talk) 15:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that the AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China COVID-19 cover-up allegations) was more about getting the article to stop being an article, rather than a specific consensus that the chosen target was actually the appropriate one. Since the AfD closed, Chinese government response to COVID-19 was moved to mainspace, and its draftspace version was a popular merge target in the AfD.

A previous merge discussion found issues with redirecting to COVID-19 misinformation by China, namely that the two aren't the same thing. Basically, I'm starting this RfD to ascertain whether it would be more appropriate to have the redirect target as Chinese government response to COVID-19 rather than COVID-19 misinformation by China. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Chinese government response to COVID-19. In the AfD discussion I supported redirecting to the misinformation article for lack of a better target, but now that the government response article has been moved to mainspace, it's a better target. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Chinese government response to COVID-19. More appropriate target that is no longer a draft. It is also, overall, a better and more precise target for the cover-up link. Given that a cover-up is a type of response. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 15:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Chinese government response to COVID-19: This article has a better scope to cover the content in question. ––FormalDude talk 07:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Onenote.com[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. I withdraw these - I was clearly mistaken. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 12:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term; per WP:COSTLY. Qwerfjkltalk 11:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This domain belongs to Microsoft OneNote (and is mentioned in the article). What's implausible? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - redirecting URLs to their owners seems entirely sensible. It's something a onenote user might reasonably search for. User:GKFXtalk 12:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pypi.org[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. I withdraw these - I was clearly mistaken. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 12:42, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term; per WP:COSTLY. Qwerfjkltalk 11:43, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is literally the website of pypi though. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – seems like a plausible search term to me. It's the URL of the website that the article is about. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 12:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - redirecting URLs to their owners seems entirely sensible. User:GKFXtalk 12:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gist.github.com[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. I withdraw these - I was clearly mistaken. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 12:42, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term; per WP:COSTLY. Qwerfjkltalk 11:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - redirecting URLs to their owners is sensible and a plausible search. User:GKFXtalk 12:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Opensource.microsoft.com[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. I withdraw these - I was clearly mistaken. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 12:42, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term; per WP:COSTLY. Qwerfjkltalk 11:36, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

China COVID-19 attempts to cover up[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:13, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, too verbose to be a plausible search term. This is left over from a reverted page move. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Awkward phrasing; a more natural phrasing already exists, and can be found by search: "China COVID-19 cover-up allegations". User:GKFXtalk 12:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and it's POV. – The Grid (talk) 22:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Online-only bank[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 31#Online-only bank

Draft:Candyman[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 1#Draft:Candyman

Validity of Catholic Church Authority[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:10, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what it this redirect is supposed to refer to, and what is mentioned in the Catholic Church section of the article it leads to does not relate to the redirect. Therefore, I recommend deletion. Veverve (talk) 20:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • The admin at the time who closed the AfD and turned the article into a redirect stated: "result was: Redirect to Sacred Tradition". However, it is absolutely not what the result of the AfD was: all opinions were in favour of deleting apart from one which suggested a delete and a redirect. This AfD result supports even more my proposal to delete this redirect. Veverve (talk) 00:43, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pinging the closing admin Quarl who was last seen in March. However, there was no objection by any one to the closure as Redirect. Jay (talk) 05:11, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_24&oldid=1064613259"