Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 13, 2020.

2020 Silverstone Formula 3 round[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating for deletion per WP:RfD#D10 (to promote article creation).
SSSB (talk) 21:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom to encourage article creation, especially due to the presence of redlinks on the main season article. A7V2 (talk) 10:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ISOGAL[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention. Unclear why this should even redirect. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete they appear to be a team working at the Infrared Space Observatory, as per image caption on [1]. But as that's the only mention of them, I doubt anyone would be searching for them. And if they are searching, they're not going to find anything in target article. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Joseph2302. If nobody has added mention yet, we are only going to WP:SURPRISE people. It can be re-created at an appropriate time if added in the future. -2pou (talk) 19:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Conservateur[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

French for conservative, it's used in dozens of different contexts on Wikipedia, too broadly to be worth disambiguating. I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTDICT. Aasim 21:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Canadian Pizza[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to List of pizza varieties by country#Canada. Involved close, I don't have any issue with this proposal and the redirect's creator has already implemented it. signed, Rosguill talk 23:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While Hawaiian pizza was invented in Canada, it doesn't appear to ever be referred to as "Canadian pizza". Searching online, I mostly get results for Canadian pizza chains, including some non-notable restaurants titled "Canadian Pizza". I would lean towards deletion, although redirecting to List of Canadian pizza chains may be a workable alternative. signed, Rosguill talk 16:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Formyl hexanoate[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chemically non-sensical term. The only uses I can find are an echo-chamber of online databases that themselves do not appear to have actual curation or reliable sourcing ("outside the garden") for this sort of detail. All I can find by google or SciFinder are it as a substring in the name of other chemicals, or as a synonym for a different chemical altogether, none of which have WP articles. DMacks (talk) 16:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, just delete it as it doesn't make sense for methyl hexanoate and if it meant anything would be the mixed anhydride between hexanoic acid and formic acid. That's in Pubchem "here". but not in Chemspider and WP:NOTNOTABLE, I think. If I remember correctly, any derivative of formic acid with a decent leaving group just decomposes, giving carbon monoxide etc. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 16:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Correct about the rapid decomposition of formyl–LG structures. Many are isolatable and can be kept at low temp in solution for "a while" and are notable enough for articles (formyl fluoride, formic anhydride, acetic formic anhydride, all of which citedly do decompose), but I agree with the lack of notability of this one. DMacks (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

New India[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 20#New India

Template:Uw-disruptive[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Template:Uw-disruptive1. WP:IAR/WP:AVALANCHE close due to this obviously being the most helpful target, so best allow the retargeting to happen to best help editors. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 04:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose retargeting to Template:Uw-disruptive1. Reason: I do not remember a single warning template where the prefix redirects to anything higher than level 1. Most disruptive editors are acting in good faith. I did not realize that this was a problem until one of the scripts I am working on sent a bunch of level 3 warning messages. Aasim 03:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_13&oldid=979618073"