Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 14, 2020.

Daybreak Productions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 01:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Midnght Radio[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No indication this is a common or plausible misspelling of Midnight. ♠PMC(talk) 01:34, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Seems to be misspelt also. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Project X Entertainment[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 22#Project X Entertainment

Kimmelot[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 22#Kimmelot

Maniac Productions[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 21#Maniac Productions

Connecting[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete then move Connecting (TV series) over it. Wug·a·po·des 19:47, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Target disambiguation page has no entries with "Connecting" but there is a possible target article Connecting (TV series). — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sexism in the United States[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gender inequality in the United States. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 18:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Target article has no section about a specific country. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 17:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ek Villain 2 (film)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 21#Ek Villain 2 (film)

Cleanup from User:Acid Of Carbon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete all except 123 Benzo. signed, Rosguill talk 19:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Random typo-redirects created by now-indef'ed disruptive editor. It's part of a pattern was creating nonsense terms for chemicals, so while this is "just" a typo, here it's just a formality of cleaning up the disruption (not PROD/speedy-able). DMacks (talk) 14:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete to 3, as made up, don't seem like plausible typos. Last 1 is just 123 instead of 1,2,3, so seems reasonable to keep. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all except the last one, which I agree is plausible enough for keeping. CycloneYoris talk! 18:38, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Justice League not Unlimited[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects are all incorrectly disambiguated as the series they belong to is Justice League (TV series) and not Justice League Unlimited. Each redirect has a correct version and all have no incoming links. These redirects are harmful as they are mispresenting the link. I've replaced the few usages that were in use. Gonnym (talk) 14:11, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Addlehead[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 14:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and redirect to Stupidity per my comments at [1]. SilkTork (talk) 10:55, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: It's a valid pejorative. If it's not mentioned in Idiot, then that should be remedied along with adding all the other pejoratives SilkTork mentioned [2], plus Eejit, Cooyon, Dunderhead, and Dipwad which were all nominated around the same time. Normal Op (talk) 17:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC) Inserted link to diff of SilkTork's old comment. Normal Op (talk) 16:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC) [reply]
  • Delete Is this really "commonly wikified", to quote SOFTSP? The documentation for Template:Wiktionary redirect itself also discourages frivolous and excessive uses. --BDD (talk) 18:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears (talk) 13:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or soft redirect. Per WP:PROPORTION, stuffing up stupidity or idiot with a bunch of obscure terms of abuse for stupid people sounds like a terrible idea. It will neither help readers find the stupidity article nor give them a more encyclopedic understanding of the topic of stupidity. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 06:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dunderhead[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 14:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and redirect to Stupidity per my comments at [3]. SilkTork (talk) 10:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: It's a valid pejorative. If it's not mentioned in Idiot, then that should be remedied along with adding all the other pejoratives SilkTork mentioned [4], plus Eejit, Cooyon, Dipwad, and Addlehead which were all nominated around the same time. Normal Op (talk) 17:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC) Inserted link to diff of SilkTork's old comment. Normal Op (talk) 16:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC) [reply]
  • Delete We don't have any encyclopedic usage of the slang term, and a soft redirect would impede access to other legitimate topics. I don't see cause for disambiguation yet, but the search results may return what readers are looking for, with a prominent Wiktionary link to boot. --BDD (talk) 18:24, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears (talk) 13:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

666-666-6666[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Respectively, this redirect is a phone number. However, it is not mentioned at the target. Also, when I search this up, I found some stuff like when calling 666-666-6666. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 12:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brain freeze (psychology)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:brain freeze. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No incoming links, term not used in the target article. Seems to be a novel or very obscure synonym; searching Google Scholar for "'brain freeze' memory" and "'brain freeze' recall" turns up next to nothing. The only significant exception seems to be a 2016 article in Scientific American that connects the term to "choking", "nerves", and "jitters" rather than any memory phenomenon. Might be a good candidate for a soft redirect to Wiktionary:brain freeze. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:10, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Soft redirect to Wiktionary might be OK, but the Wiktionary entry would have to be cleaned up so it doesn't circular reference the Wikipedia article. The informal phrase is used in psychology AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 14:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Video System[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as a result of 2016 AfD that ended in a merge to target; the section about the developer was removed from the target page in October 2019 due to lack of refs (it did cite an EGM article) and appropriateness of having the developer's history on the target page. FMecha (to talk|to see log) 07:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, not just an improbable search term, it's all but impossible that anyone would be searching for this with the intention of finding a 1992 video game. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Ambiguous and may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. All I can find for this is partial title matches. Thryduulf (talk) 19:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as vague and a surprise to point to such a title. It could redirect to Video which talks about video systems in the first paragraph. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 22:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.