Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 6[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 6, 2020.

Longest Wikipedia Articles[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 15#Longest Wikipedia Articles

Beata Thunberg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable minor, no mention on target page, no edit history from other than page creator, spurious categories, possible BLP issues Captainllama (talk) 21:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. per nom. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:20, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete there is no story in Greta's sister. I've only ever seen one news article abut her, and it was about Greta, with a passing mention for Beata.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 01:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and by redirecting the article to Greta Thunberg without any mention of Beata, it could make people who used the redirect think Beata is a nickname for Greta. OcelotCreeper (talk) 00:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Poland women's national under-20 volleyball team[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Deryck C. 00:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention in the target article Pelmeen10 (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anniversary gift[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 21:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not very plausible target, maybe simply redirect to Gift or Anniversary. Also applies to Anniversary gifts. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom per WP:XY. Steel1943 (talk) 00:11, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Eh. Steel1943 (talk) 01:49, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The article extensively discusses a traditional hierarchy of gifts for wedding anniversaries, which suggests that this is the primary meaning intended for the term. A redirect hatnote can address other meanings, if needed. BD2412 T 00:50, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, discussed fairly extensively in the target, so it takes the user to what they're probably looking for. Hog Farm (talk) 01:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Quint(Megaman Character)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking space before parenthesis, wrong capitalisation. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:37, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Acceptance criteria[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Deryck C. 00:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Acceptance criteria" could refer to myriad topics, up to and including the criteria used to assess whether a redirect is appropriate. I would suggest deletion due to ambiguity. signed, Rosguill talk 20:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Orc (Dungeons & Dragons)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 21:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:UNHELPFUL. Is there really a point to creating this redirect 2 seconds after the article was deleted and pointing this here when it has a single-sentence mention that will disappoint anyone looking for info on D&D Orcs? I suppose then we'd have to create similar redirects to every single franchise mentioned in the Orc article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Redirects are cheap, and this section redirect now points to the only place in Wikipedia that mentions Orcs in Dungeons & Dragons. The section can easily be expanded by a line or two, and I have helpfully done so. Redirects from the other franchises mentioned would also be helpful to readers looking for content on orcs in those franchises, to the extent that such content exists in this article. BD2412 T 18:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - the redirect is correct, logical, and very possibly helpful to some, so it seems an obvious keep really. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:41, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep because of the arguments already presented. If the content present at the target is now disappointing to users of Wikipedia, that would beg the question if the deletion of the former article was indeed beneficial to Wikipedia, rather than being an argument for the deletion of the redirect. Daranios (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It's mentioned, and an AfD result of delete does not preclude creation of a redirect unless there's a strong consensus not to. Hog Farm (talk) 02:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hong kong kong[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:34, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meaningless redirect AINH (talk) 13:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Autopsy (2006 film)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 15#Autopsy (2006 film)

User:Shayedmollah312[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Useless cross-namespace redirect. User's only edits are to create this redirect in the userspace. Normally against deleting content in the userspace unless its spam, but this is just clogging the server. Hog Farm (talk) 01:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Narky Blert (talk) 10:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, borderline speedy, as this appears to be nothing more than an abandoned experiment. BD2412 T 19:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Lenticel (talk) 01:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The fact that this users only contributions were making this redirect suggest this user is a NOTHERE. OcelotCreeper (talk) 20:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Steelhaven[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Transformers: Animated. signed, Rosguill talk 01:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This formerly redirected to an article that itself has now been deleted and redirected, and it's not mentioned at all at the new target. Reyk YO! 14:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Transformers: Animated. Steelhaven is mentioned in four articles, and that one has the most detail (a paragraph). Remove the link to Steelhaven from that article. Narky Blert (talk) 15:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 00:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Destined for Greatness[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. signed, Rosguill talk 01:36, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the song there. This redirect was created by Timwikisidemen and for six days that he is not mentioning it to the song. 2600:6C4E:580:A:3DEF:F071:1D34:2CA7 (talk) 01:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate. I've added a draft. (The redirect was presumably intended to refer to Tobi & Manny Feat. Janellé: Destined for Greatness, but we have no target. There's also an album, but we have no article even on the musician.) Narky Blert (talk) 09:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak disambiguate per Narky Blert above and because of the significant pageviews in the preceding period (~70 in the last month). I say weak because it's only two bluelinked pages, one of which is for the pseudonym of a mixed martial arts event. I feel like this title would be better as a broad-concept article. It's got the pageviews to support it and, as a phrase, it's got lots of potential meanings. So maybe weak disambiguate for now without prejudice to turning into a BCA boldly? ;-) Doug Mehus T·C 15:33, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 00:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate. I think the phrase is a bit generic to sustain an article of its own, but I have no objection to someone trying to create one. BD2412 T 19:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_6&oldid=945637845"