Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 27[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 27, 2020.

Internet Security Barrier X6[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target 2pou (talk) 14:48, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tiny car[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 6#Tiny car

Large city[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR. Settlement hierarchy, for example, says otherwise (but doesn't provide an alternate target). Clarityfiend (talk) 21:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ecological burial/funeral[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Natural burial. signed, Rosguill talk 19:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promession is only one of the many body disposition ways that are called "ecological burial/funeral" (like Alkaline hydrolysis (body disposal)), thus these redirects are incorrect. Wikisaurus (talk) 21:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Wuhan Coronavirus 2019[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another cross-namespace redirect that likely should not exist. Zoozaz1 20:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete. This is an abandoned draft. Not sure why MarkZusab chose to redirect instead of letting it WP:G13 delete as it expired. Technicaly it has history, but since it's in the draft space and would qualify for G13 if it were restored, I think just deleing it now is fine. −2pou (talk) 03:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Corona Chasers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know why this cross-namespace redirect exists, and I don't think this is an appropriate or common redirect. Zoozaz1 20:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete, I guess. They are WP:CHEAP, and this WP:NEOLOGISM is in the draft space, so it's not going to pop up in any standard searches to mislead anyone, but we're already here now, so might as well finish it. As to why, the history shows that it was a single edit account trying to create a brand new term, and it eventually was redirected, presumably as a valid WP:ATD. —2pou (talk) 02:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. After being exposed to the term "bugchaser", I am guessing that this refers to people who either want to get infected by COVID-19 or just really, really want to crack open a cool refreshing can of Corona beer. The current target (not a section redirect either) doesn't have the word "chaser" or mention a group of people who want to be infected. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Korona pandemic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is an uncommon misspelling of Corona pandemic, which itself is an uncommon phrasing. Over the past 30 days, there have been 7 pageviews. Zoozaz1 20:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Famous Lies[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if "lies" should redirect to "misconceptions". 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Famous doesn't mean common either. The average reader would probably expect something like this, except without the top 10 part. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 05:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gun Girl[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could also be used for the many other female shooters or gun owners with articles 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 19:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Liberty Hangout[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to a reporter for the website not sure why 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 18:46, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I'm going in depth because 1.Ayana asked not sure why. Ms. Bennett is the only notable person associated with this website. One can learn a lot about Liberty Hangout from her article, including: 1) it is a far-right organization that she reports for, 2) that it was founded by her husband, 3) the website published interviews that Bennett conducted called "College Students Have No Morals" that received some attention, 4) the website "received criticism for statements on Twitter supporting Holocaust denial, monarchy, and disfranchisement". No other article has this kind of content, all other mentions are in references for articles associated with Darrell Castle and the Libertarian Party (US). -- Tavix (talk) 19:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the research done by Tavix. —2pou (talk) 01:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

William Gliesa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:53, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems unlikely. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete this redirect. While the A and E keys are really close to each other on a QWERTY keyboard (and adjacent to the S key), thus creating potential plausibility, it doesn't seem to be used that much, having attained 35 pageviews since July 2015. Regards, SONIC678 20:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Los diez fugitivos más buscados por el FBI[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — Wug·a·po·des​ 02:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No specific association with Spanish, delete per WP:RLOTE signed, Rosguill talk 18:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom and WP:RFOREIGN, these fugitives (past, present, and future) originate from a variety of countries, not all of which have Spanish as an official or widely spoken language. Regards, SONIC678 20:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:RFFL. Narky Blert (talk) 02:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of famous engineers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Lists of engineers. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 01:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Lists of engineers or delete. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Silas (football manager)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 7#Silas (football manager)

Technical Black Films[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the company at target. Delete to encourage article creation. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

101st Street Entertainment[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the company at target. Delete to encourage article creation. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

IOS 3.0[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. — Wug·a·po·des​ 02:47, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not really described at target; retarget to IOS version history#iPhone OS 3. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@1234qwer1234qwer4: Nono, I said let’s just keep it the way it is. ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 15:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Prahlad balaji: Then I don't understand your argument. The suggested new target describes this exact version of iPhone OS 3, while the current article hardly mentions it. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: I see your argument, now I have changed mine to retarget. ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Prahlad balaji: Thanks; could you do it in the discussion below as well for consistency, please? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4:  Done ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per above. ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - the first sentence of the first paragraph starts with "iPhone OS 3 is the third major release of the iOS mobile operating system developed by Apple Inc.", and then mentions the "iPhone OS" -> "iOS" rename. If that's not sufficient to explain why "iOS 3.0" goes there, explain further, as per my suggestion in the discussion of the iOS 1.0 redirect. As for "iPhone OS 3.0", yes, there's currently no short release history in iPhone OS 3, although iOS 4 has one, but only has release-numbered subsections for update releases, so iOS 4.0 redirects to iOS 4, so I don't see the issue. Guy Harris (talk) 19:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep. Like Guy Harris and the IOS1 nom below, I'm not really seeing the problem here. The content at the current target is fine. I guess the proposed retarget is as well, but why go to a subsection vice an article? Unless there is a desire to merge into the IOS version history (and i could potentially see that as a possibility) since it falls WP:WITHIN the scope, and there isnt a whole lot more at the target, but that's not for RfD. —2pou (talk) 02:07, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @2pou: There is almost no information specific to version 3.0 at the current target, while there is in the list. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • @1234qwer1234qwer4: In the infobox, I am seeing a big 3.0 in the image, and the archived website specifies 3.0. Then in the two sources for the initial release, 3.0 is in the title. I guess thats not necessarily in the base text... I imagine because the version info once lived here before being merged to the version history.
        I suppose that I'm somewhat neutral overall, though. Like i said, both are valid targets. I just feel like the current target gets you to the same info via the {{main}} link in what used to be a version history. If I were a page watcher, and this were boldly retargeted, I would not revert it. However, we should be consistent. Why is 3.0 being singled out? The same arguement can be made for all versions except the latest, 3.2.2 (and even that is only in the infobox). Every redirect to this page outside IOS 3 calls out a version number. —2pou (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • @2pou: Oh wow, I didn't notice them; thank you. Apparently I only used the search suggestions. Yeah, I suggest they also be retargeted (as long as the version history exists separately from the major version articles). 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Guy Harris and 2pou. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 06:05, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

IOS 1.0[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 19:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target; retarget to IOS version history#iPhone OS 1. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@1234qwer1234qwer4: Nono, I said let’s not change it and let it be the way it is. ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 15:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per 1234qwer1234qwer4. ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - the target says "iPhone OS 1 is the first major release of iOS"; if that's not sufficient, perhaps it should explain that "first major release of iOS" means "it'd have been iOS 1, but they didn't call it iOS yet". Guy Harris (talk) 18:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Guy Harris: Do you understand my argument? It's not about the incorrect name, it's about the specific version 1.0, which is not described at the target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • @1234qwer1234qwer4: I understand it, I just think it's not a good argument; I don't see any problem with "iOS 1.0" going to an article about it-would-be-iOS-but-they-hadn't-renamed-it-yet 1. If somebody's ambitious, they could put a version history into the article and make it link there. Guy Harris (talk) 10:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Guy Harris: I don't understand why you are referring to the fact the redirect says "iOS" instead of "iPhone OS" then. This is absolutely not the point. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:42, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • @1234qwer1234qwer4: Just to ward off arguments that "I typed "iOS 1.0" but this page says "iPhoneOS 1", not "iOS 1"." would matter. Guy Harris (talk) 10:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
            • @Guy Harris: What is your argument for not retargeting to a list where, as opposed to the article, the exact topic is mentioned? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
              • @1234qwer1234qwer4: 1) I'm not convinced that people looking for "iOS 1.0" are necessarily curious about that particular minor version - they may well just want information about the major release - so I'm not convinced the change adds much, and 2) for those who do want information about the minor release, that information should be put into the "{iPhoneOS,iOS} N" articles (and maybe iOS version history should be carved up and the pieces dropped into the "{iPhoneOS,iOS} N" articles) - that'd solve the "this article is too big" problem). Guy Harris (talk) 11:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
                • iPhone OS 1#History now has an "Introduction and initial release" subsection for iPhone OS 1.0, as well as an "Updates" subsection for subsequent releases. Guy Harris (talk) 22:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Like Guy Harris, I'm not really seeing the problem here. The content at the current target is fine. I guess the proposed retarget is as well, but why go to a subsection vice an article? Unless there is a desire to merge into the IOS version history (and i could potentially see that as a possibility) since it falls WP:WITHIN the scope, and there isnt a whole lot more at the target, but that's not for RfD. —2pou (talk) 02:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per my !vote at the 3.0 RfD. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 06:07, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

South Mexico[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 6#South Mexico

List of famous Ahmadis of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Section removed from target. Retarget to List of Ahmadis? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Southey savaged the misuse of the adjective "famous" in "After Blenheim" (1796). Narky Blert (talk) 03:05, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

IOS 15[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a misleading redirect in that the target article provides no information about this topic. If I wanted to find specific information on iOS 15, I would be disappointed to end up at an article that doesn't have what I'm looking for. -- Tavix (talk) 01:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tavix: Well, iOS 14 was created well before there was any content. Thanks, Thanoscar21talk, contribs 17:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If iOS 14 was created before there was any content, it should have been deleted at that time. If it wasn't, then that's an oversight, not an excuse to create another misleading redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_27&oldid=966433544"