Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 2, 2020.

Rainy Men[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:11, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was created as an article about a song it claimed was on The Resistance by Muse, half a year after the album came out. However, this song is not on the album, and it does not seem to exist, as nothing comes up on Google about it when searching for "rainy men" muse. This redirect has no purpose, and should be deleted. DemonDays64 (talk) 23:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, I'm not seeing anything relevant to Muse or anything else to retarget it to (most google hits seem to be scanoes and wet weather clothing for men). Thryduulf (talk) 23:59, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

W. Bush[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bush (surname). (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:14, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous with all the William Bushes and Wesley G. Bush. It may be a legitimate way of differentiating between the two Bush presidents but it does give off big ambiguity vibes. Retarget to Bush (surname) is my preferred option, but deleting this is fine. — J947 [cont] 21:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

6 Articles[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Six Articles. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Six Articles as ambiguous? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agree. This proposal seems reasonable to me. Ltwin (talk) 23:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom. "6 Articles" and "Six Articles" should not lead to different pages. Thryduulf (talk) 00:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom as ambiguous. — J947 [cont] 00:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:R from missing punctuation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to {{R from modification}}. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If the punctuation is missing, is it a misspelling? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:42, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:R from slang term[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#Template:R from slang term

☈[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) CrazyBoy826 20:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article. CrazyBoy826 20:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Paris of the South[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#Paris of the South

Md Mushfiqur Rahman[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 12:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, note also that this redirect was created by a user that has since been blocked for spamming. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I don't see any connection of this doctor (assuming "Md" actually meant for M.D.) to the college in question. The title of the redirect is not helpful either, as there are a lot of doctors named Mushfiqur Rahman from different universities and colleges. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 02:37, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I would assume "Md" is for Mohammad, but that doesn't help. No-one's going to learn anything about him at the target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kazi Kamrul Hasan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 12:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While the target mentions a "Syed Kamrul", there's no full matches for this name. Searching online, "Kazi Kamrul Hasan" appears to be the name of a recording artist with no obvious connection with the current target. Note also that the editor that created this redirect has since been blocked for spam/advertising. I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Name has no obvious connection to target article. CycloneYoris talk! 04:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ContentBarrier X4 and Personal Backup X4[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These are not mentioned at the target. Cleaning up the last two Intego product version redirects after VirusBarrier version RfD resulted in delete. -- 2pou (talk) 16:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

UberTwitter[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect to a list article which purports to require that only applications with a full article may be listed there. Apart from the redirect and the redirect target, this Twitter app is mentioned only at Ashton Kutcher, a celebrity endorser who doesn't represent a useful target either. There is no real content about this app anywhere on Wikipedia, and helping readers to find nothing is useless. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 15:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. CrazyBoy826 20:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete because it has now been removed from the article (aside: that "article-specific guideline" smacks of WP:LOCALCONSENSUS, but we're not really here to discuss that...). Anyway, this redirect doesn't seem helpful to the user. --NYKevin 04:56, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I didn't care to say anything more than "purports to require" on that point. In any case, there was no substantial content in the now-removed list item either. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 15:15, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Steiermark Grand Prix[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to 2020 Styrian Grand Prix. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects were created as placeholders when the new 2020 F1 season calendar was announced per convention. However, the name has since been corrected to Styrian GP rather than Steiermark GP so these redirects are no longer necessary. No articles point to them.
5225C (talk • contributions) 10:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep. But retarget to 2020 Styrian Grand Prix. Note that this retargeting did already happen but was reverted by the nominator. Seems like a plausible search term. Steiermark is the native name of Styria and it its native language its called the "Großer Preis der Steiermark".Tvx1 13:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't have a problem with retargetting, but that edit caused a conflict which I had to overwrite to list it here.
    5225C (talk • contributions) 22:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes I see. Both the edits in question happened around the same time. Nevertheless you could still have changed the redirect target in the edit window when the edit conflict popped up before saving the page.Tvx1 11:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Goidelic (Gaelic) languages[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 22:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary disambiguation. See this and this. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This formatting does have some usage. Some examples for attestation purposes include: [1][2][3][4]. For what it's worth, this was suggested to be the title of the article back in 2005. -- Tavix (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Tavix. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:05, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C0r0na[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted per WP:CSD#R3 by Maile66. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 14:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure this redirect is unnecessary, I don't believe that anyone writes "C0r0na". TheImaCow (talk) 09:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unusual mis-spelling therefore not in scope for redirect. The target is also too specific for a vague misspelling. If one wanted to make the case to keep the redirect, it should probably point to Corona.pseudonym Jake Brockman talk
  • Speedy delete R3. Pointless and was just created a couple minutes ago. Spicy (talk) 09:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Corona. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 11:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It's a sIlLy InTeRnEt corruption spelling. No point even noting it, except for deletion. -- Tytrox (talk) 11:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Howard–Englewood–Jackson Park Line (CTA)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Previously used only in a template, this redirect is no longer used, and not useful. Punctuation is wrong (hyphens should be dashes); case is wrong (Line is never capped in this context in sources); unnecessary disambiguator (CTA) would never be used in a link. Might as well remove the temptation. Dicklyon (talk) 06:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Characters of Negima (other characters)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects don't specify what characters are meant to be excluded (there is a section about other antagonists, but I'm not sure about refining there), and could potentially confuse readers. Regards, SONIC678 04:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see any useful purpose in the existence of this redirect. -GTBacchus(talk) 11:11, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per GTBacchus. The pageview statistics of these redirects show very low usage (like this for the first redirect). Characters of Negima (Other characters) didn't even have any view at all in the past 90 days except for 2 June 2020. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 02:43, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Characters of Blood+ (other characters)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Last year in February, this redirect's "Other characters" sister was deleted, and this one's section...doesn't seem to exist, at least anymore. Like the other one, it's still unclear what "other" characters it's meant to exclude. Regards, SONIC678 04:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see any useful purpose in the existence of this redirect. -GTBacchus(talk) 11:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, GTBacchus, and my argument at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2#Characters of Negima (other characters). This one doesn't have any pageview in the last 90 days except for 2 June. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 02:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Smash the House redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target. No reasonable target can be found that describes these artists. More abandoned redirects by Zawl, and were formerly listed here but removed by Alexf per WP:NLIST. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unless some information about the subject of the redirect, with at least one reliable source, can be added to the target. I did a Google search for Dave Till, and didn't find such a source connecting him to Smash the House.—Anne Delong (talk) 04:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

National Democrats (Norway)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 12#National Democrats (Norway)

Beacon Communications[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Beacon (disambiguation)#Businesses and organisations. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article does not mention why this redirects here, and there is no mention of "Beacon Communications" at [5]. The term is ambiguous with Beacon Communications Corporation and Beacon Communications (publisher). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The page for the filmmaker was originally at Beacon Communications because that was the company's former name (see, e.g., the IMDB page for Air Force One -- scroll down to "Company Credits". I created this redirect more than a decade ago when working on articles about newspapers because even with the name change, I figured more people would know "Beacon Communications" as the producer of blockbuster films than would know about a couple very small publishers of local newspapers. Some connection to the filmmaking company should be kept -- perhaps this should be a dab page with links to all three articles. ``` t b w i l l i e ` $1.25 ` 23:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My updated choice, thanks to Shhhnotsoloud. There is now a citation for "Beacon Communications, LLC" at Beacon Pictures. --Bejnar (talk) 15:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Digital content creation tools[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Way too vague, could refer to dozens of things besides 3d graphics. Suggest deleting. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 04:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete for now, as too amorphous for DAB, no good target hence no navigational value. --Bejnar (talk) 04:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Hopelessly ambiguous, could be anything. Narky Blert (talk) 13:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, Bejnar, and Narky Blert. I'm not even sure why this was a redirect to 3D computer graphics in the first place, as a search in DuckDuckGo doesn't show any 3D tool in the first page of results. --im temtem • hOI!! • fsfdfg • alt account of pandakekok9 03:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sharktooth Hill[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 22:38, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This term is not mentioned in the target article except in a reference. Is it the same as Sharktooth Peak, also in California? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

note STH is a fairly well known fossil site in the Temblor of Kern County, CA. References to the site can be found in both scholarly journals and general online searches. It is distinct from Sharktooth Peak. Ryan shell (talk) 14:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps Ryan shell would be willing to use some of those reliable sources to add to the target an appropriate paragraph (or sentence) on significant outcrops of the Temblor Formation. --Bejnar (talk) 03:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is a line in the intro referencing STH as a significant outcrop within the formation; I can reinforce that with a few academic refs Ryan shell (talk) 20:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:36, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep it is an accurate target, and serves a navigational purpose. The Temblor Formation article just needs some work. --Bejnar (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Butt stuff[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article and could also technically mean Poop. Not sure what to do with this one. OcelotCreeper (talk) 18:41, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It sounds like something for Encyclopedia Dramatica. Not useful or notable, especially given level of interpretation between cultures. -- Tytrox (talk) 03:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anial sex[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 22:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The "i" is far from the "n" and "a" on the QWERTY keyboard making this look like an unlikely search term. Delete unless a justification can be proven. OcelotCreeper (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, probably a misspelling. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 22:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as misspelt and ambiguous: could also be a typo for animal sex. Narky Blert (talk) 07:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is a misspelling (and should be tagged as such), but based on 106 page views last year and no shortage of google hits for the exact term it appears to be a common one. While "animal sex" might seem equally plausible, the google results show it is not used in that sense. Thryduulf (talk) 10:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    A misspelling from which? One too many letters or one too few? Narky Blert (talk) 13:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    As I said, a misspelling from "Anal sex" is the only one that actually sees usage. This might be because "anal sex" is a much more frequently used term than "animal sex" but it doesn't matter why one is used and the other not, only that in practice this isn't ambiguous. Thryduulf (talk) 13:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    How do you know? Narky Blert (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Because in 100% of the uses I found in searches the meaning was very clearly anal sex not animal sex - as I said initially. If you can find significant use to mean "animal sex" then I will reconsider, but as it stands the evidence is clear. Thryduulf (talk) 18:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    How is "anial" a misspelling for "anal"? "animal" I can understand. The "i" on a US EN QWERTY keyboard is nowhere near the space between A and N keys. Perhaps if it were "anail", but that'd be trivial. -- Tytrox (talk) 10:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Tytrox: I don't know why people spell it that way, but that doesn't matter. The only thing that is relevant is that based on all the evidence we have people do use this spelling to find content about "anal sex" and they don't use it to find content about "animal sex". Thryduulf (talk) 10:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Thryduulf: Understood. Keep/redirect/disambiguation is perhaps unnecessary. Perhaps we should let wikipedia do a "did you mean...?" spelling correction suggestion. -- 02:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • To a certain extent the search engine does this, but in this case it doesn't find anything in article space and even if it did search results are always inferior to being taken directly to the article your are looking for - which is why we have redirects from misspellings in the first place. Yes its possible we get it wrong for a minority of users, but this is no different to any other case where you make a misspelling that happens to be the correct name of another article (e.g. typing Lads or Lade when looking for Lada). Thryduulf (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Public Service (TV series)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually no page history in the last year. It is mentioned in the Conception section of the article so either retarget to there or delete. OcelotCreeper (talk) 19:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_2&oldid=963677446"