Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 2, 2020.

Weezer (2017 album)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weezer did not release a (EDIT:self-titled) album in 2017, and the redirect is currently an orphan. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 23:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Super weak retarget to Pacific Daydream (a 2017 Weezer album) or delete. While Weezer did release six self-titled albums, none of them were released in 2017. Regards, SONIC678 23:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • That is true; also, their self-titled albums are disambiguated by the predominant color of the cover, not year of release (though there could be exceptions were this redirect actually used in links.) – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak retarget to Pacific Daydream since it was released in 2017. CycloneYoris talk! 01:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Weezer discography#Albums. This is a plausible misremembering of either Pacific Daydream, Weezer (White Album) (released 2016) and Weezer (Teal album) (released 2019). As we have an article that lists all of these we should take readers to it so they can find whichever one they were thinking of. Thryduulf (talk) 02:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Pacific Daydream or delete. Weezer only had one 2017 album, so this is only a valid {{R from incorrect name}} for that album. It's not a very plausible term though, given that Weezer's albums are disambiguated by color and not year, so I'm fine with deletion should that be the way the pendulum swings. -- Tavix (talk) 14:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Why would we expect someone to know how we choose to disambiguate these articles before they have found them? Why is it more plausible to get the name of the album wrong than to get the least significant digit of the year wrong? Thryduulf (talk) 16:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Fine, just delete it then. It's not a plausible search term to begin with, so it's not worth arguing which target may be better. -- Tavix (talk) 16:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • On the contrary it seems a very plausible search term and 75 hits last year certainly backs that up. We don't need to work out which album is more plausible (I don't think at least two of the three are equally plausible) if we target the list. Thryduulf (talk) 22:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There is no 2017 album called Weezer. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is simply not helpful. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Simple I Love You[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of subject in the target article. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Although this is apparently a song by the band, I'd say delete this redirect, because there's no mention of it in their article either on the English or Indonesian Wikipedias-not even on any of their albums' articles that exist on the latter. It also appears to have been released earlier this year, making its notability...questionable, to say the least. Regards, SONIC678 23:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Subrata roy (author)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 13#Subrata roy (author)

Huawei Marine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:29, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These appear to be largely unrelated subjects; searching "Huawei Marine" online, I came across a company website where the only result related to Hengtong was a press release that they were cooperating on a project. It's not clear to me whether Huawei Marine has any connection to Huawei (and it's not mentioned at that article), so for now I think that deletion is the most appropriate course of action. signed, Rosguill talk 17:57, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hasenheide[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Neukölln (locality). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand that the redirected album contains a song with this name. However, this redirect is highly confusing, considering that to most people, it will be known as the recreational area in Berlin (which sadly does not have an article yet). Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Neukölln (locality) - which contains both a public park and a street of that name. I doubt that the song title merits accommodation, but if so, could be made a disambiguation instead. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Elmidae and tag as {{R with possibilities}}. Hatnote the target with {{redirect|Hasenheide|the song by Mogwai|Hardcore Will Never Die, but You Will}}. The song surely does not pass WP:NSONG, and likely never will.
I've added {{ill}} links to de:Volkspark Hasenheide and de:Hasenheide (Straße) in Neukölln (locality) (which needs some {{cleanup}} to comply with MOS:BOLDFACE and MOS:ITALICS). We can worry about the other entries on the German DAB page de:Hasenheide at some other time. Narky Blert (talk) 23:15, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gdhdhgh[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G1. It's amazing this lasted for 14 years. -- Tavix (talk) 23:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsensical redirect completely unrelated to its target. I suggest deletion. CycloneYoris talk! 06:18, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete If this was recent this would have been speedily deleted. --Pandakekok9 (talk) 11:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The creator of this redirect seems to have otherwise made good contributions relating to military ranks, but there's no indication this is anything but nonsense. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 12:01, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I am unable to determine why this exists or redirects here. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Left-hand middle-row typing. There's usually an 'f' or two in such strings. Answers like that used to be (and probably still are) a popular way of building points on Yahoo! Answers ("point-gaming to ask"). Narky Blert (talk) 18:15, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as patent nonsense. A Google search turned up nothing relevant to this topic for me. Regards, SONIC678 19:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete. Nonsense. Hog Farm (talk) 20:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It is literally just an assortment of random letters to form a non-existent word that does not relate to the target article. Also this redirect is only a month old. Captain Galaxy (talk) 22:18, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • A month old? It was actually created back in 2006. If it were a month old it would still be eligible for speedy deletion. CycloneYoris talk! 22:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ESRB re-rating of MySims[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Thryduulf (talk) 23:36, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This event did not happen. Despite what the old version of this page says, Sims games are still rated T, and this game in particular never was re-rated. DemonDays64 (talk) 05:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The fact that it's not mentioned at the target is enough reason for deletion. --pandakekok9 (talk) Junk the Philippine anti-terror law! 10:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Multilinear[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. There's consensus for disambiguation, but it's not clear to me exactly what is being proposed as content for the disambiguation page. 1234qwer1234qwer4 and Amillar, you have the all clear to go ahead and implement a dab page at the redirect. signed, Rosguill talk 20:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest disambiguating, as had already been done with bilinear and as I now did with trilinear. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:30, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, disambiguating is the best approach. Amillar (talk) 01:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_July_2&oldid=967519367"