Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 4[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 4, 2020.

Composers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Composer. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 00:19, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently redirects to Lists of composers; it's more usual to redirect plurals to their singulars, so in this case to composer - as indeed this once did. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Beauty of Becoming[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Rotimi discography#EPs. Editors provided solid justification for a redirect, withdrawing the nomination and implementing the suggestion. signed, Rosguill talk 01:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 21:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is the title of one of his EPs. Retarget to Rotimi discography#EPs, where it's mentioned. - Eureka Lott 23:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per EurekaLott. Even if the record were mentioned in the biography, the discography would be the better target. Narky Blert (talk) 00:48, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Megastar Mammootty[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:05, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Purely promotional redirect name. May apply WP:RFD#DELETE #4. Not linked anywhere and unlikely to be linked either. 137.97.14.106 (talk) 19:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. If it ain't mentioned in the target (and it would need a WP:RS to justify putting it there), it ain't worth keeping. Narky Blert (talk) 00:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Twisted Ranch[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I've heard a lot about this restaurant (and it's been on my bucket list to try when I'm in STL). Accordingly, I thought there might be enough to whip an article up on this. The coverage is mainly local, but I did find, eg: People, Southern Living, Delish, and a section in an NYT article on ranch in case someone wants to give it a try. -- Tavix (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, I would suggest deletion unless a justification is provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:34, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Twisted Ranch is a fairly new brand of ranch. They are sold in grocery stores. They come from the restaurant of the same name. Click here: [1]
--Noah Tall (talk) 18:58, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If the target article doesn't mention this brand of Ranch dressing, then this redirect isn't of much use. signed, Rosguill talk 23:35, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non-notable condiment/restaurant. --BDD (talk) 18:52, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 16:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the Ranch dressing article does not mention this particular brand nor do I see any reason thst it should.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 05:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bad ISO redirects for OMICS journals[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:04, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as misleading redirects (created by mistake by bot from my own request). The OMICS journal abbreviation are JBR J. Interdiscip. Med. Dent. Sci. and JBR J. Clin. Diagn. Res. not these. The above refer to either non-existent journals, or different journals. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per request from bot owner task requester. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:06, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not quite bot owner, but rather guy who told the bot owner what needed to be created, and the bot owner obliged. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:12, 5 January 2020 (UTC) Oops - thanks - my comment edited. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:04, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Copte[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:03, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:FORRED. No affinity for French, and only mentioned in the title of one French-language reference. No incoming links, and averages about six hits a month. 94.21.10.204 (talk) 14:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hierarchy and order[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:AND, WP:XY. There is a DAB page at Order, where Hierarchy is one of the entries. The two topics are orthogonal, really. 94.21.10.204 (talk) 14:28, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

D tuning[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. After 12 years of a long unsourced list, we have come to a realization that the list is completely useless and unnecessary, and we put its main section at the main guitar tuning page, so I believe it is time for the D tuning page to be deleted for good.SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 11:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This a plausible search term, and even if it wasn't, the page needs to be preserved per WP:CWW. I tagged the redirect as a {{r from merge}} and {{r to section}}. - Eureka Lott 16:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a plausible search term. Page views (over 500 in the last month) and {{R from history}} are enough to merit a keep alone, but this is actually a pretty common alternative tuning that one might search for. ComplexRational (talk) 18:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to encourage article creation.SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Software mirror[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 January 14#Software mirror

Article Deleted, Administrator plese delete[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. WP:G2, test page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No apparent use. Improbable search term. Not sure why this would be a redirect. Hog Farm (talk) 02:41, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.