Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 15[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 15, 2019.

File:Polyiamond cartoon.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent creation , practically unused ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 02:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Don't think the full stop is necessary or helpful for this or any other redirect that is a complete sentence. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: Changed my mind; the redirect is apparently from a page move, and could thus potentially be useful. Geolodus (talk) 21:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

All international sports events held in São Paulo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Section does not exist, and target article would not include "All" if it did exist. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:Omicron Delta Kappa logo.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, recent creation, file was renamed to avoid a naming conflict with other media. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:KOF94gameplay.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created, Not in use in mainspace. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ann Shea[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 23#Ann Shea

Rigani[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 23#Rigani

Wikipedia:WPBT[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 02:45, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Effectively Unused meaningless shortcut clutter Legacypac (talk) 21:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Apparently, the target project (or one of its predecessors) was called Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists of basic topics, so the shortcut makes sense. Are there any other possible uses for this shortcut? – Uanfala (talk) 07:51, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the page view stats show that this is being used, and perceived "clutter" is not a reason to delete a redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 13:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:SURPRISE, since the connection between the initialism and the target is completely unclear. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I was going to close this but got distracted and went and participated at DRV for a bit. When I got back, the above comment had been added. At this point, I am loathe to either close or relist as I feel somewhat INVOLVED, feeling vaguely committed to my prior read, but I felt I should state that. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Romantic (architecture)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:12, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. We haven't Romantic architecture, and the mentions in the article are all about Gothic architecture. Perhaps WP:REDLINK, perhaps redirect to Gothic. We have Category:National Romantic style architecture, and obviously "Romantic architecture" is a common name, but nothing quite hits the nail on the thumb. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 10:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm not sure what the problem is. "Romantic" is the adjective for the form of architecture known as "Romanticism" (see e.g. Curl). Bermicourt (talk) 12:49, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, the mentions in the target are all for Gothic architecture and Gothic Revival architecture. If that is synonymous with Romantic architecture we should say so: but there is no good wrongfooting people looking for Romantic architecture to find the only content is about Gothic architecture. i.e. WP:RFD#D2. 178.164.162.144 (talk) 04:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Given that this term is used for widely divergent styles, this is, at best, an ambiguity. If a term has no single meaning, a single redirect is a very bad thing. Qwirkle (talk) 19:08, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambig - it seems that this is referring to several different things with none of them being primary - exactly why disambiguation pages were invented. Thryduulf (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:REDLINK until an article on this topic can be created, presumably at Romantic architecture. Also note that per WP:INCOMPDAB, disambiguating at this title is not an acceptable solution. -- Tavix (talk) 20:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 07:33, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 11:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bassena[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore article and relist at AfD. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:02, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was originally a short article describing a Viennese residence of a type often known in English as a bedsit. It isn't an English word, it's German. Someone then redirected this title to Bedsit. But, first, WP:NOTDICTIONARY, which includes this not being a translation dictionary. Second, as a redirect, WP:FORRED applies. Third, the translation is wrong anyway. A bassena isn't a living space, it's a community spigot shared in such a space by residents without in-unit drinking water. See de:Bassena. Largoplazo (talk) 14:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore article. If a bold redirection is wrong then it should be undone. If there are problems with the article then that should be addressed in the usual manner or nominated for prod/AfD where the content can be assessed. Thryduulf (talk) 16:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore article per Thryduulf. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:REDLINK. Yes, it would be nice to have an article on the concept, but the WP:DICDEF in this history is not it. -- Tavix (talk) 20:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 07:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Tavix: RfD is not the place to determine whether an article should be kept or deleted, if you think it is just a dicdef and that deleting is better than improving then that is an argument you should be making at AfD after restoration. AfD is where those editors who are experienced in judging things like this, and where those who are good at and interested in expanding such articles where that is possible will see it and give it a fair hearing. Thryduulf (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • No, I don't like wasting time with additional discussions if I feel it unnecessary, which I do here. It's been a redirect for a decade and a half, and an article for about a week, so it's fair to treat it as a redirect in this instance. -- Tavix (talk) 14:14, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • I do not share your view that such a discussion would be unnecessary or a waste of time. RfD is not the the place to evaluate content that does not meet the speedy deletion criteria because it is not set up to evaluate content any more than AfD is a correct venue to discuss redirects. Thryduulf (talk) 19:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • It's a good thing we are discussing a redirect then. -- Tavix (talk) 23:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 11:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ohio Star[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 23#Ohio Star

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_March_15&oldid=1072177153"