Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 13, 2019.

Our Lady of America[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Marian apparition#Our Lady of America. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This extremely obscure supposed apparition is not discussed in the article on Mary. Mangoe (talk) 19:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per below, I agree with the suggest to repoint to the appropriate section in Marian apparition. Mangoe (talk) 15:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good idea, thank you, gnu. I created the redirect to Mary, mother of Jesus, and would like to apologize for it. I was in a bit of a hurry, and too focused on getting Our Lady of America to not be a separate article any more. I acknowledge that I didn't find a very good target. Bishonen | talk 15:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]
  • Retarget to Marian apparition #Our Lady of America. I've added an anchor to that paragraph in anticipation of the retargeting. This could be speedy closed as a retarget, I believe. --RexxS (talk) 17:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per RexxS --Lenticel (talk) 01:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per RexxS; the section suggested has the most important information re this apparition (not that obscure, since Cardinal Burke, a big name, is endorsing it, which is covered in the reference to the section). TheBlinkster (talk) 19:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Thomas Liebler[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 21#Thomas Liebler

Claudia Bill-de la Peña[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 21#Claudia Bill-de la Peña

French Federation of Undersea Studies and Sports[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep per Wikipedia:Renominating for deletion. This was just closed today at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 4#French Federation of Undersea Studies and Sports -- Tavix (talk) 18:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "French Federation of Undersea Studies and Sports" is not found in sources and is not a plausible search phrase. Anyone wanting to access the article Fédération Française d'Études et de Sports Sous-Marins from English will use the common abbreviation FFESSM. RexxS (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spanish Federation of Underwater Activities[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep per Wikipedia:Renominating for deletion. This was just closed today at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 4#Spanish Federation of Underwater Activities. -- Tavix (talk) 18:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "Spanish Federation of Underwater Activities" is not found in sources and is not a plausible search phrase. Anyone searching from English for Federación Española de Actividades Subacuáticas will use the common abbreviation FEDAS RexxS (talk) 16:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Missing or redundant brackets[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. It's worth noting that not all of these are of the same format, and in the past a different style of unbalanced parenthesis has been kept (mainly because they were linked from reddit). ~ Amory (u • t • c) 20:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per the outcome of other discussions. Missing or redundant brackets, typically created in error and not useful. No significant page histories or links from mainspace. PC78 (talk) 11:59, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hazeldean, Buckinghamshire[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Hazeldean, Buckinghamshire and Wendover Marsh and retarget Scrubwood, Buckinghamshire to Dunsmore, Buckinghamshire. -- Tavix (talk) 19:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per the CN tag I can't find a trace of Hazeldean in Wendover parish, there is a place (or at least "Hazeldean Farm") in Chartridge so it could be changed to redirect there but it doesn't appear there should even be content there as it doesn't appear to have even been a settlement. Its not in the Domesday Book and Vision of Britain doesn't have anything on this one. I therefore recommend delete. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC) Same with Wendover Marsh which does at first glance appears to exist on Google but that's because of a different place called "Marsh". For Scrubwood there is a wood called "Scrub Wood" but no hamlet (or even farm) appears to exist by "Scrubwood". Unless the wood is covered in the Wendover article (or a more specific article in which a Scrub Wood redirect would be needed) we don't need to keep this redirect either. @Chris j wood: who added the CN tags. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 03:03, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Hazeldean, Buckinghamshire, there is a cul-de-sac named "Hazeldene" in Wendover [1] but there are also various farms and properties named Hazeldean elsewhere in Buckinghamshire so it's ambiguous, and with no substantial mention at the target article it doesn't seem particuarly useful. Perhaps retarget Scrubwood, Buckinghamshire to Dunsmore, Buckinghamshire per [2], i.e. "until the 1900s, much or all of what is now called Dunsmore was commonly known as Scrubs or Scrubwood". Also delete Wendover Marsh, I can't find any trace of this. PC78 (talk) 12:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I (weakly) agree with the retarget of Scrubwood, Buckinghamshire. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:57, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tashaun[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Don't see why this first name has to redirect only to this particular person. He is not exceptionally well known to only use his first name. Natg 19 (talk) 01:59, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment are there others that use the name? I might make a Teshaun dab page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:17, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per {{R from given name}}, this is the only notable person with the name. -- Tavix (talk) 03:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per {{R from given name}}. An intitle search turned up no-one else, so there's nothing to disambiguate. Narky Blert (talk) 09:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per others above: redirects like this are fine if there is no other notable person with this name anyway. Geolodus (talk) 21:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_March_13&oldid=888996228"