Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 19[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 19, 2019.

Microloxia chlorissoides[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this redirect. It is a redirect from one species name to a genus name. We have no content about the species and it would be better for this to remain a redlink.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  21:36, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, better to have as a redlink than as a redirect. 16:31, 20 June 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plantdrew (talk • contribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Radioactive polonium[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Isotopes of polonium. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:35, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Polonium is by definition radioactive; no need to mention it again in the title. I recommend deletion for this reason, though if it is kept, it should redirect to polonium, as that is a more appropriate primary topic. ComplexRational (talk) 20:52, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • What about Isotopes of polonium? It's a better target than the poisoning incident certainly, but I do appreciate the point that all polonium is radioactive. I'm only looking around because I think generally, redirecting "[Adjective] Foo" to "Foo" is unhelpful, since a user will basically always know they can search "Foo" directly. --BDD (talk) 21:03, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@BDD: That is true; isotopes of polonium is a possibility as well (though to me, the adjective still feels redundant). ComplexRational (talk) 21:15, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's only redundant if you know your chemistry. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:55, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Genève Aeroport[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:35, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a not useful misspelling. Either it is French: Genève-Aéroport and referring to the official French stop name of the the Geneva Airport railway station, or then it is French: Aéroport de Genève and refers indeed to Geneva Airport. ZH8000 (talk) 18:48, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep I don't think omitting a diacritic is really a misspelling, though it's weird to do so when you use a diacritic elsewhere in the search term. This goes where I would expect it to in an English encyclopedia. --BDD (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Additional side note: This redirect is neither linked by any article, nor was it visited by any user (page views is 0 for the last 30 days). -- ZH8000 (talk) 12:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually 0 is so low as to be suspicious to me, but it looks like there was 1 view so far in 2019 prior to this nomination. That does make me even less confident. --BDD (talk) 16:06, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per BDD. Omitting one of two diacritics is certainly a very plausible spelling error for someone who isn't fluent in French. The redirect is unambiguous and has been around for 10 years, so there is at least a slight benefit and no harm in keeping it while we would gain nothing from deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 19:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hawkeye (DC Comics)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:10, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - subject not mentioned at the target article. The section that used to refer to it was removed 20 November 2012. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:30, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spice rack[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:45, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REDLINK. I think this is probably worth an article, but either way, there's no discussion at the target article of spice racks or storage of spices otherwise. BDD (talk) 20:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, better to have as a red link than as a redirect. Plantdrew (talk) 16:30, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:REDLINK. There is also a record label by this name that is mentioned in a few articles, but that doesn't have an article either (and I've not looked to see if it is notable). Thryduulf (talk) 19:48, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Adhurs Raghu[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 30#Adhurs Raghu

Petdam Gaiyanghadao[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 30#Petdam Gaiyanghadao

Tseries[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. --BDD (talk) 15:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to T series (the disambiguation page) as an ambiguous search term. I don't see why this should target the company specifically. Geolodus (talk) 12:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Challenge 3[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:42, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No mention in the target, although Dev appears to have starred in Challenge and Challenge 2. If kept, I think that redirecting to Challenge is likely more appropriate. signed, Rosguill talk 17:28, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unless we can identify any topics referred to as "Challenge 3". Of topics listed on the disambiguation page, only Challenge International de Tourisme 1932 looks to have a case, albeit a weak one. Also, while the two film articles contradict each other, the overall point seems to be that Challenge 2 was just a repackaging of an unrelated film. --BDD (talk) 13:43, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Difference equation[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 June 26#Difference equation

Surat Tennis Club[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:55, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects created in an attempt to appear notable, redirects to city they exist in, nothing else. Ajf773 (talk) 08:48, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 21:06, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Surat is in India so they are no plausable redirects. Ajf773 (talk) 22:41, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_19&oldid=1138582737"