Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 October 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 31[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 31, 2018.

Good Bye Kowloon–Canton Railway[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. Redirects created when cleaning up page move vandalism are explicitly covered by criterion G3. Thryduulf (talk) 14:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page move vandalism; unlikely search term. Jc86035 (talk) 17:48, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Black family[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Deryck C. 11:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing on target page about the Noble and Most Ancient House of Black, probably all removed from Wikipedia as "cruft". There may be a more appropriate target elsewhere such as The Black Family. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 14:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Hertfordshire Golf and Country Club, Broxbourne[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Deryck C. 11:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect created as a result of a page move. This is an unremarkable golf club which happens to inhabit a Grade 2 listed building. Which the article creator appears to have no interest in, since the article barely mentions th e building. TheLongTone (talk) 13:53, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep The golf course is mentioned at the title, and given it is the full name of the current occupying organisation it seems a useful search term. Thryduulf (talk) 14:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The discussion of the golf club in the target is indeed insubstantial, but I think that's less of an issue when it's effectively a different name for the same building. The target provides some useful information to someone who searches for the golf club (a separate article on the golf club would presumably cover much of the same ground). Neither of the first two sentences of the nomination contribute to a rationale for deletion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Money (Cardi B Song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 09:01, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article already exists with the correct capitalization at Money (Cardi B song). This page previously redirected to Cardi B discography. — Newslinger talk 13:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trump's dubious relationship to truth, facts, and reality[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 11:15, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article has many redirects already.[1] This particular one is not a natural search term: it is an essay-like disparagement of the subject, apparently originating from an editor's essay WP:TRUMPBIAS#Trumpian problems vs RS and facts which states "This is a very small portion of what's available on Trump's notoriously dubious relationship to truth, facts, and reality." (courtesy ping BullRangifer)

This redirect clearly falls under the exceptions to WP:RNEUTRAL, viz. "not established terms and unlikely to be useful". We can do without it. — JFG talk 05:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fair enough. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete "Dubious" is itself dubious; it is up to searchers to make up their own minds on the validity of his statements. JZCL 21:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. While redirects from non-neutral terms are not inherently problematic, I agree that this falls within the exceptions to WP:RNEUTRAL. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 01:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.