Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 6[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 6, 2018.

Template:Use Philippine English[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 December 14#Template:Use Philippine English

Xích Tỵ[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

deletion. This redirect makes little sense: It is linked to only from the article to which it then redirects, and it's not explained there at all what or who Xích Tỵ was. Thanks. Enyavar (talk) 17:06, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

PC Magazin[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 02:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete PC Magazin is not PC Magazine Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The redirect might cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I created the redirect because I was living under the impression, that both magazines had the same origin, but newly researching this now does not support this. So, I agree that it should be deleted. Potential alternative: If we had an article about the Weka publishing group, I would suggest redirecting it there as we usually do. This would help disambiguating the two magazine titles. But we do not seem to have such an article yet, either... --Matthiaspaul (talk) 20:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 02:07, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Coins and Coin Collecting[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:XY; Coin collecting is a separate article. Steel1943 (talk) 17:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete basically no traffic and an XY from an awkward term; Coin collecting would be a better target if there were reason to keep this. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:10, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Numismatics which is about both coins and collecting as an academic discipline and has a hatnote to coin collecting. "Coins and Coin Collecting" is a very, very common title and stock phrase for books, articles, etc. so it is a plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 23:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. -- Tavix (talk) 15:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 12:50, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Because "Coins and Coin Collecting" is such a popular title in real life, and Wikipedia has no such article, this redirect might cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:11, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Scamway[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. N.b., I added {{R from non-neutral name}} when this was first listed. --BDD (talk) 16:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It just sounds like an attack page. I get the whole subject is an MLM, but even so it sounds like it shouldn't be here. Yet, it has been around since 2004 and not deleted, so... startTerminal {haha wow talk page | startTerminal on irc} 03:05, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be inclined to !vote delete, on the grounds that it doesn't serve much of a purpose. The redirect does appear on the first page of Google results for "scamway", but I'm still not convinced that it's a good idea to keep it. --Slashme (talk) 09:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It's existed since 2004, so could use some more input
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:56, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment it's got just a handful of mentions on search [1] and books [2] although a different book uses it as a fictional company [3] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:01, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources provided by Angus. feminist (talk) 05:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I firmly believe non-neutral terms need to be reliably sourced, and this term isn't even mentioned at the target. -- Tavix (talk) 14:49, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 11:50, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Furriest[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 02:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely adjective redirects that would have been eligible for WP:X1 if it was still active. Steel1943 (talk) 05:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Untitled Boba Fett Anthology film[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete." -- Tavix (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no information about a Boba after film mentioned in the target article. There may be a place to retarget this, but if I recall, after what happened with Solo: A Star Wars Story, the plans to make a Boba Fett film or film series was cancelled. Steel1943 (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 04:30, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Untitled Orion (ENT)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete." -- Tavix (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear what this refers to, considering the use of "Untitled". Steel1943 (talk) 20:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Untitled Tape 3[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete." -- Tavix (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Target article is unclear on what this redirect refers to. Steel1943 (talk) 20:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Digimon Around[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete." -- Tavix (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From searching for the term, I gather that this is the name of a rumoured series that never actually existed. The rumour is not mentioned at the target article. —Xezbeth (talk) 20:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Untitled The Flash film[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete." -- Tavix (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The target article is unclear what this redirect refers to. Steel1943 (talk) 20:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Untitled The Departed sequel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete." -- Tavix (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No information at the target page about a sequel. Steel1943 (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kishmish[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete." -- Tavix (talk) 14:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, and possibly a WP:FORRED I sue as the target dues not seem to have affinity with any particular language. Steel1943 (talk) 19:09, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Clusters (vine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete." -- Tavix (talk) 14:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The connection between the redirect and target is unclear. But, if it is clarified, I cannot see the redirect exclusively referring to its present target. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draksha[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete." -- Tavix (talk) 14:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FORRED. The target does not have affinity to Sanskrit. Steel1943 (talk) 19:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Metallic currency[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete." -- Tavix (talk) 14:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect could also reasonable target Currency. Seems it may be more helpful to delete this redirect so that readers can determine what subject they are intending to locate. Steel1943 (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Don Luther[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no discussion, the default result is delete." -- Tavix (talk) 14:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not appear in target article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:33, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 04:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tolly Carr[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 02:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bringing this to RfD per discussion at WT:RE#Redirecting of Tolly Carr. Tolly Carr has been redirecting to WXII-TV since 2009 and for a time Carr was actually mentioned by name as a former staff in that article; sometime in 2011 or 2012, however, most of the content was heavily trimmed and the mention of Carr was one of things taken out. So, basically, the name now redirects to an article where there is no mention of the person at all. Re-targeting might be an option, but apparantly the only other Wikipedia page Carr was mentioned on was (Tolly), and that mention has been removed. Re-adding information about Carr to the WXII also might be a possibility, but not sure that should be done just to keep a redirect; moreover, the content about Carr which had been previously in the article might have been removed for BLP and WEIGHT reasons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:45, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not appear in target article UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:18, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_December_6&oldid=1036307449"