Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 26[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 26, 2018.

Modern Mathematics[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 6#Modern Mathematics

Grounds for divorce in other countries[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As the edit summary states in this redirect's only edit (the edit as a result of this redirect's target page being renamed from this page): countries "...Other than what? Wikipedia has readers and editors all over the globe." Steel1943 (talk) 20:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I am the one who moved the article with that rationale cited. I'm not sure what the question is here though, so I do not know how to respond. LadyofShalott 22:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. Although we should always be wary of deleting redirects from page moves, the chance of link rot here is very low as the article was only at this title for the first ~90 minutes after creation 6½ years ago. It is getting a smattering of hits, averaging about 10-12 a year, which is enough to give me pause but the problem with the title, low relative numbers (the target averaged 118 hits per day in 2017) and high likelihood that the target will be found by search engines even without this redirect mean that any value in keeping it is not sufficiently high to outweigh the problems. Thryduulf (talk) 00:53, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral - I don't really care if it exists or not. (I did not assume deletion, because this is Rf Discussion. Nomination for deletion was not made clear, and should not be assumed.) LadyofShalott 23:59, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks for this — it's good to have a reminder every now and then. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Farrell (clothing label)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Robbie Williams#Farrell clothing. Section added ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:29, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles make no mention of the clothing company - According to the About us It's jointly owed between him and his dad but readers searching this would expect to read information on it somewhere, IMHO pointless redirect, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I checked the articles at Robbie Williams (disambiguation) and found no matches for this. I think this may be supposed to be some non-notable person with the same name. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:02, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • (edit conflict) Delete as misleading and/or per WP:REDLINK (I haven't investigated whether it is notable) as there is no mention in the target article (nor was there when the redirect was created in August 2011). It is getting a lot of hits, but almost certainly from the incomming links at the Farrell disambiguation page and in the single-sentence at Olly Murs#Other work. That sentence, "Murs has also been involved in modelling/fashion work, including some modelling for the autumn/winter 2012 range of Robbie Williams' clothing label Farrell.", is the only information we have that I can find but it not a suitable target for the redirect, particularly if the section gets rewritten into proper prose. If the label is or might be notable though then I recommend retaining the (soon to be) red link. Thryduulf (talk) 01:06, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and add a paragraph about it in other ventures. There are articles back in 2011 when he announced he was creating a clothing line in honor of his grandfather Jack Farrell. [1] [2] and it was a collaboration with Peter Jones (entrepreneur). It relaunched in 2014 with Primark's support [3] [4] It's still active. As a paragraph was written about his ventures in forming a FC, a similar paragraph can be done for Farrell. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:47, 27 April 2018 (UTC) updated 16:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the paragraph. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nom comment - I would suggest retargetting to Robbie Williams#Farrell clothing which would IMHO make sense, As there's deletes etc I obviously can't withdraw but retarget may be a good choice?, ANyway thanks AngusWOOF for adding this in the article :), –Davey2010Talk 22:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Råbi viliams[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the article, Google brings up no results, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:24, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Some drive-by editor was just being cute and saying his name with a foreign accent. wbm1058 (talk) 00:29, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I can find no indication that the subject (or anyone else) has ever used this name anywhere. Thryduulf (talk) 01:10, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:FORRED AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:16, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pure Frances[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the article, Google brings up no results (although does bring up his "Make Me Pure" song which seems to be completely irrelevant), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:22, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No context. wbm1058 (talk) 00:17, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. This is a spelling error for "Pure Francis", which does get mentions in reliable sources e.g. The Telegraph and on his website [5] both of which indicate that it was an idea for a project that ended up happening under his own name. There isn't anything on the article about this currently, but if there were (and I don't know whether there should be) then I'd suggest moving the redirect to the correct spelling and refining to the relevant section. Thryduulf (talk) 01:20, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ah well spotted!, Google does turn up quite a few sources on it[6] but as it's not not mentioned in the article I'm not entirely sure if it's worth keeping ?, That being said if someone more competent than me wanted to somehow add that in I wouldn't have any objections but if kept I do agree this should be moved, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:48, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yeah, if it is added to the article then the redirect should be moved and kept/refined (depending where in the article it is added). If it isn't added then I'm also unsure if it's worth keeping (at any title) or not. I'll drop a note on the article talk page to see if it brings useful input. Thryduulf (talk) 02:20, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the misspelling can be removed in the meantime. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:29, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Robbie Williams (band)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 6#Robbie Williams (band)

Unused redirects for Template:Stnlnk[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 6#Unused redirects for Template:Stnlnk

Gigartina binghamiae[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thanks to Plantdrew for the clarification. -- Tavix (talk) 23:50, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted, as Chondracanthus exasperatus is not the same as Gigartina binghamiae, and it's causing a self-redirect on the Chondracanthus exasperatus page. Daemyth (talk) 18:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the taxonomy is not clear, as the citation in the article[1] points towards synonymy. This really needs someone who knows Chondracanthus/Gigartina very well to clarify it with current sources. --Nessie (talk) 18:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Hughey, Jeffery Ryan (15 December 1995). A Systematic Study of Chondracanthus Kutzing (Rhodophyceae) with a Contribution to the Marine Flora of Tomales Bay, California (PDF). Rohnert Park, CA: Sonoma State University. OCLC 971001627. Retrieved 26 January 2018.
Delete. According to AlgaeBase, Gigartina binghamiae is a synonym of Chondracanthus corymbiferus. AlgaeBase is the source cited in the synonyms section of the taxobox for treating G. binghamiae as a synonym of C. exaspertus, but appears that AlgaeBase has since changed their position on the synonymy. As we lack an article for the currently accepted name, delete the redirect as lacking a proper target. Plantdrew (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

清创[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unsure whether these meet WP:FORRED since it’s not actual Chinese. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 17:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both First one is a real medical term meaning debridement and has nothing to do with the target. Second is an implausible misspelling of multiple targets (e.g. King Kong) but the actual spelling of nothing. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both - I agree that neither of these seem worth keeping. The first in particular is a perfectly valid medical term, just one that's not in English. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 19:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:55, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kakaty[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit confusing and misleading that a {{R from surname}} redirects to a band article, especially considering that there is no evidence of the person which this refers, Leigh Kakaty, using their surname as a mononym. In fact, in most cases (if not all), surname redirects are only helpful for readers if they redirect to a biographical article for the person which th surname applies ... which this redirect does not. Steel1943 (talk) 17:06, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

DEVORCE[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. 9.5 years flying under the radar. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling in all caps. Steel1943 (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Keep per cheap redirect. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:41, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Take a look at the contributions of its creator. Should have been deleted when speedy-nominated back in 2008, rather than converted into a redirect. wbm1058 (talk) 00:07, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Jax 0677. Perfectly plausible misspelling and perfectly plausible capitalisation. The creator looks to have been trying to improve Wikipedia, although unsuccessfully, but even if they weren't we should comment on the content not the contributor. The redirection was a correct application of WP:ATD. Thryduulf (talk) 01:30, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Wbm1058, not a useful redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 01:41, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • So if this is a plausible misspelling then create devorce and properly tag it with {{r from misspelling}}. wbm1058 (talk) 02:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - It's fine to have typos for things turned into redirects, but I've got to question whether or not this is helpful at all. As stated above, this doesn't seem like what somebody would plausibly type when in doing a good-faith search. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:46, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Wmb1058, CoffeeWithMarkets, and Tavix: 134 people used the redirect between 1 January and the day before the nomination, 347 people used it last year. This is very clear evidence of plausibility. Thryduulf (talk) 09:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In 2017, Divorce was accessed 419,317 times. The redirect DEVORCE was used 347 times last year. That means that a microscopic 0.000827% of the people who accessed divorce did so though DEVORCE. This is very clear evidence of implausibility, especially when one takes into account the fact that the search engine is case sensitive. If Wbm1058's suggestion of creating the logical typo redirect of devorce is enacted, I reckon that most if not all people who have used the redirect in the past year will instead be served by devorce, along with the added bonus of removing the spam in this redirect's history and resolving the WP:RCAPS problem since divorce is not a topic that has any affinity with all caps. source. -- Tavix (talk) 12:26, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I went through the discussion again, and the nomination concerned just the caps, so I created devorce without prejudice. Problem solved. -- Tavix (talk) 12:29, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still struggling to see any problem with this redirect, solved or otherwise. Thryduulf (talk) 22:04, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all-caps version refers to a non-notable metal band. [7] Now that the lower-case version was created, there's no need to keep the all-caps version. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete due to potential ambiguity with non-notable things with proper name "DEVORCE". Deryck C. 12:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Family/clan name[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Family Name. Seems like this dab certainly fits the original intent. Besides, 2005, old style ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since Clan name is not a redirect to the nominated redirect's target, this redirect should be deleted per WP:XY. Steel1943 (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • retarget. We have a Family Name disambiguation page that now links to the Clan name disambiguation page, and so would make an appropriate target. I've added a hatnote link to the Family Name dab from the Surname article (where Family name redirects) so the current target will also now serve people using this redirect, but less well so keeping is my second preference. Thryduulf (talk) 01:48, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is an awkward redirect, it's unclear what someone would want. -- Tavix (talk) 01:58, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's perfectly clear that they want information about family names, clan names, and/or surnames which are all related concepts and all listed at the Family Name disambig. XY is applies where we do not have a single relevant target to send people looking for a combination of unrelated things - neither part of that is the case here. Thryduulf (talk) 09:42, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tales of Game's Presents Chef Boyardee's Barkley, Shut Up and Jam: Gaiden, Chapter 1 of the Hoopz Barkley SaGa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The title speaks for itself, as to why it is an implausible redirect. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Doyle Lee Hamm[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 6#Doyle Lee Hamm

A'Donte[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:47, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's no evidence that A'Donte Washington was known mononymously. Redirecting readers to a list of deaths with these search terms, for that reason, is misleading and confusing. Steel1943 (talk) 14:01, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? How is that a plausible typo? "Andante" has an extra letter and there is no O. Plus, that would obscure searches for "Adonte" to a place where none of the entries are known as such. -- Tavix (talk) 22:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to reveal search results, since the discussion so far has established that we have at least two non-notable "A'donte" / "Adonte"s discussed by other articles on the English Wikipedia. Deryck C. 12:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Crystal Clarke[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:47, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actress with multiple credits should not redirect to a single minor role. --woodensuperman 13:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment she doesn't have enough credits to meet WP:ENT yet: only 1 major credit in a television miniseries, and the minor role in star wars which wouldn't count. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So delete? --woodensuperman 08:06, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would Delete for WP:TOOSOON but I can see a draft being constructed with the news articles around. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:25, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cheyne Hutchinson[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 12:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Gold Coast Football Club article doesn't mention him and he seemingly never played for the team. §pur§y§ituation§ (talk) 13:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Based on [8], [9] and [10] he did play for GCFC in the 2009 season, but only that season. In 2008 he was with the Broad Beach Cats [11] but that link, from 2011, is the only reliable source I can find mention of him in post-2009 and it strongly implies he chose a different career. There is no way, based on what I've found, that he is notable enough for an article and no reason to redirect to any one of the two or three teams he played for over the others, especially as none mention him. Thryduulf (talk) 02:12, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A standard practice in WP:AFL for players who did not play a senior AFL game for the club is to redirect the page to List of XX Football Club players, however, Cheyne Hutchinson was not listed with the club when they were in the AFL, therefore, he does not satisfy this redirect. Flickerd (talk) 13:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lakeith Smith[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete and retarget. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:47, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 12:23, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Evil / The evil / Suck evil / Suck Evil[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 6#The Evil / The evil / Suck evil / Suck Evil

Toll-free telephone numbers in Anglo-America[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 12:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is misleading because the countries in the North American Numbering Plan is a different set of countries than Anglo-America. For example, the Dominican Republic, Sint Maarten, etc. are in NANP and not Anglo-America. Belize, Guyana, etc. are in Anglo-America and not NANP. -- Tavix (talk) 03:08, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. I'm entirely unsure why anyone would think of Anglo-America as being a region relevant to telephone numbering at all, but I've seen much stranger at RfD in the past. Thryduulf (talk) 02:15, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Thug Wikipedia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Deryck C. 12:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be an implausible redirect. Septrillion (talk) 00:41, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. See "Everipedia, also known as “Thug Wikipedia” to the insiders–which includes everyone by design–is the unannounced, and impossible to ignore, lovechild of the popular online encyclopedia and Facebook."[12] See "Its creators, who have called the site a “thugged-out Wikipedia,” aspire to someday host hundreds of millions."[13] See "The website, as the founders call it is a “thugged-out Wikipedia” which is a crowdsourced encyclopedia and knowledge aggregator."[14] See "He is now cofounder of Everipedia, known as the “Thug Wikipedia”.[15] Everipedia is also known as the Thug Wikipedia, according to the sources presented. QuackGuru (talk) 01:49, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "THUG Wikipedia! How the new startup Everipedia prepared for growth". Rebelhack. 7 February 2016. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
  2. ^ Jafari, Hamed (9 June 2016). "Interview with the Founders of Everipedia AKA the "Thug Wikipedia"". TechRasa. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
  3. ^ Sanger, Larry (17 March 2016). "The notorious co-founder of Wikipedia interviews the notorious co-founder of Genius". Medium. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
  4. ^ Sitaraman, Viputheshwar (12 November 2015). "Q&A: Mahbod Moghadam -- Cofounder, Everipedia". Huffington Post. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
  5. ^ "Invest in Everipedia| The crowd-sourced online encyclopedia for absolutely everything on @wefunder". Everipedia on Wefunder. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
  6. ^ "An Interview with Mahbod Moghadam, the Co-Founder of Everipedia and Rap Genius". pastemagazine.com. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
  7. ^ "Everipedia". F6S. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
  • Keep - Even if it's a pejorative name, it's something used online by a variety of individuals and seems worth keeping as a redirect. We don't have to have strict, NPOV wording for redirects after all as they're not page titles; 'Tricky Dick' exists and appropriately goes to Nixon's page. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 20:16, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per all the above sources and WP:RNEUTRAL (which is what CoffeeWithMarkets is almost certainly referring to). Thryduulf (talk) 02:17, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_26&oldid=1138582233"