Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 9[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 9, 2017.

Specia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 03:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd assume this comes from "special needs" or something similar, but is this term ever used? A google books search returns results pointing to: a) a concept in ecology introduced by Kinji Imanishi; b) incorrect pluralisations for Species, c) a surname (the surname of the Italian contestant at Miss Universe 1972, there's no article on the English or Italian wikipedias about anyone of that name); d) a Russian organisation http://specia.pro; e) a Finnish trade union https://specia.fi. None of the topics are really covered on wikipedia, so that leaves Species as a target for a rare {{R from typo}} (of sorts), but this will only obscure the fact that we don't have content on the other (possibly encyclopedic) topics. – Uanfala 22:37, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Splitting that off to a dab doesn't help, and none of these dab possibilities point to the original redirect either. I do see it in Urban Dictionary. News searches show a person named John Specia. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I don't see the use of this. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 21:45, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above comments. No use. Legacypac (talk) 09:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Squint eyed Southerner[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 16#Squint eyed Southerner

List of Apple Software[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 27#List of Apple Software

Wikipedia talk:Itnc[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 23#Wikipedia talk:Itnc

Big dick bitch[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 03:00, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a known term for this redirect target. Possible vandalism Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Ts Madison has referred to herself as Big Dick Bitch on her Youtube channel multiple times. As Youtube is black-listed on Wikipedia, you can search on Youtube for her video entitled: Big Dick Bitch says.... "22inches or better". She introduces herself as the Big Dick Bitch at around 30 seconds in. Illinois347 (talk) 23:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a valid reason for having it as a redirect term on Wikipedia. There are more than a dozen Ghits under that term and none refer to that subject. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are mistaken. When I search "Big Dick Bitch" on Google, the first page had results that all lead immediately to Ts Madison's pornographic videos. Also, when searching on Google Images, her images appear overwhelmingly in the search results. Big Dick Bitch is a moniker by far most commonly used to refer to Ts Madison. Please verify your search results again, Kudpung.Illinois347 (talk) 01:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Proposed merger of Anheuser-Busch and InBev[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete Just like we delete "Upcoming untitled album" redirects once the album is no longer upcoming or untitled, we should delete "Proposed merger" redirects once the merger is complete. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I nominated this a couple years ago, and I still agree with my previous comments there. -- Tavix (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as no longer useful. Legacypac (talk) 10:00, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.