Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 25[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 25, 2017.

Emerico de Hungría (santo)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 1#Emerico de Hungría (santo)

Sigal Iduna Park[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 19:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The former is a simple typo of this stadium's sponsored name (Signal Iduna Park) and is uncommon enough that it was only used on one page on Wikipedia (one user's userpage, which I've now corrected), while the latter is a simple typo of the stadium's unsponsored name (i.e. the target article) and isn't linked to anywhere on Wikipedia. There is no reason to keep these. – PeeJay 18:57, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 10:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Israel-Palestinian conflict (Early history)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 19:22, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These are vague disambiguators that I don't think are helpful in determining a specific conflict. "Early history" to my mind would conjure a conflict at an early time in human history, probably to a Biblical conflict. By that same token, "recent history" is relative. Compared to a Biblical conflict, the Intercommunal conflict in Mandatory Palestine is "recent history". -- Tavix (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yeah, too vague for alternate target. Doesn't make much sense as a target or a search term. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brimstone (sulfur)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 1#Brimstone (sulfur)

Mercury,(element)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 19:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The comma is not a plausible typo. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 16:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Affluenza in Australia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus on whether to delete. However retargeting to Affluenza#In Australia. I'll note that the "in australia heading" has been removed, may want to recreate it. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The word "Affluenza" is not mentioned in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 15:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not opposed to that option, but I find it a bit odd that this redirect is the only page that starts with "Affluenza in". I do not understand why Australia would have a redirect for this and not other countries. But, then again, it could just be a case of nothing else being written yet. Steel1943 (talk) 16:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This isn't the title of the book so it doesn't help to redirect to the book itself. But the section doesn't really focus on the effects of alluenza on Australia or cite statistics, and only vaguely states a line about Australians trying measures to counter affluenza, so I would change the section header itself to Analysis or Criticism of affluenza. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per the IP. It's the only "Affluenza in" redirect, but it's also the only specific country that has a section in the Affluenza article. -- Tavix (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete per AngusWOOF: the "Australia" section is mistitled, and its current content will only disappoint readers looking for information on affluenza in Australia. – Uanfala (talk) 11:35, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Babymissfortune 01:55, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Tavix. Odd search term, but one with a logical destination. --BDD (talk) 16:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting a third time, as the "in australia" heading has been removed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Belfast Maritime Festival[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 19:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not in target, if any of these are individually notable, an article can be created for it. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

How many SCIgen papers in Computer Science?[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 19:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre search term, WP:NOTFAQ. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 04:21, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Congressmen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 03:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect does not specify what congress. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ip con[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 03:12, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't seem like a plausible way to abbreviate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I'm getting more hits for "IP configuration", but even that seems obscure. -- Tavix (talk) 03:02, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I don't see any plausible primary redirect (nor any value in a disambiguation since it doesn't seem to be an actual term used). con could mean configuration, conflict (IP address conflict), etc Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:01, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete arbitrary abbreviation or unusual neologism. Alternative would have been to convert to disambiguation page for things that IP Con should be short for, but even that seems like WP:NOTADICTIONARY.pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Not seeing this as a common name for anything. Could be about an IP Convention too. [1] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:34, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete For what it's worth, "IP configuration" is usually abbreviated as ipconfig. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Santa Claus On A Fire Truck[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 19:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas! This concept is not mentioned at the target article. -- Tavix (talk) 00:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, that custom isn't specific to Trinidad and Tobago. [2] [3] [4] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So it is vaguely a thing, I don't think enough to include in Santa Claus Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_25&oldid=1138581488"