Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 15[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 15, 2016.

Esc2017[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Caps is the preferred way for these (ESC2014, ESC2015, ESC2016 etc), As I've just created ESC2017 this is pretty much reduntant to that, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The user who created the nominated page probably did so in good faith and isn't familiar with how redirects are handled. Wes Mouse ✒ 09:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)There use[reply]
  • Taking to CSD. There used to be a time where we needed {{R from other capitalisation}} but now they just kinda block the search engine doing its job. It is not as if it is old Epson printer escape codes. I doubt I shall succeed but I will take and try. Si Trew (talk) 09:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tavix declined the CSD and I have to agree with him - To your reply here - Many people would know what "ESC" means, The country's that don't participate - Those editors would obviously have no idea what it meant however for the most part I'd say most people would know, The British section is irrelevant, We could add {{R from other capitalisation}} however in this case it'd be pointless - Whether you type in lowercase or caps you should only have one option, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm neutral on this, but I want the discussion to play out as I feel it would set a precedent of sorts for at least the other Esc discussion. -- Tavix (talk) 15:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Prenatal depression[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. --BDD (talk) 13:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless redirect. There is no mention of 'pre-natal depression' in the target article; assertion that the two terms mean the same thing (see history) make less than no sense. TheLongTone (talk) 12:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Almeron Dickinson[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neelix misspelling just spreads error on the internet. Legacypac (talk) 10:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note closely related discussion at Almeron. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 15:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as an {{R from other spelling}}, since reliable sources which pre-date the existence of this redirect [1] say this might actually have been the right spelling (even though Almaron is how most sources spell it). 210.6.254.106 (talk) 15:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Iranian Revolution of 2009[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 26#Iranian Revolution of 2009

Issoufi[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 27#Issoufi

Issoufi Maïga[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously useless redirect from middle/last name combination (Neelix). ~ RobTalk 04:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Spanish ones are not middle names. Though I don't think it's common practice to group up and redirect multiple surnames. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Speedy delete per precedent on Neelix name play. Legacypac (talk) 09:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Just as a note; I didn't nominate speedy because I actually found one middle/last redirect that was kept at a RfD. It received minimal participation (I think two editors), but that outcome is enough that it's worth establishing a strong precedent on these. There are many more, and we can then use this consensus to speedy delete the rest under the Neelix G6 CSD. ~ RobTalk 09:41, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes RfDs are incorrect. Good plan. Legacypac (talk) 03:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gaudeo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Latin words with English derivatives#Gaudeo. Deryck C. 16:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This one needs a new target. I believe that this is a nickname for a medieval chant or something? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Françoise-Marguerite[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous with Françoise Marguerite Janiçon. (Neelix) ~ RobTalk 03:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Delete this is a compound first name and likely a fairly common one. Legacypac (talk) 09:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - While not that frequent of a name, it's far from completely unique. I agree that the redirect should just be trashed. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 15:17, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment HW removed the speedy tag. He sure likes to keep Neelix redirects most of us find misleading. Legacypac (talk) 00:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep is it ambiguous though? With the hyphen, it's a compound {{R from given name}}, without the hyphen, it's a first+middle combination, and WP:SMALLDETAILS are enough to distinguish between two topics. In case of confusion, we can hatnote to Ms. Janiçon, but I don't think that's necessary. To alleviate Legacypac's concern, there is no other notable topics with the name. -- Tavix (talk) 04:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Orangishly[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Mojo Hand as per the Neelix CSD. ~ RobTalk 06:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Neelix) Obviously useless. ~ RobTalk 03:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Donald Trump Speedy delete as Neelix wordplay nonsense. Legacypac (talk) 03:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deja Vu - Weren't these already a part of a mass group of "Orang-" type Neelix redirects that were agreed to be deleted? CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_May_15&oldid=1088109132"