Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 7[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 7, 2016.

Miss Tourism World 2014[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. You were told to take this to WP:AFD, so take it there. You can't turn this into a redirect and then immediately nominate it for RFD. (non-admin closure) -- Tavix (talk) 23:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parent article has been deleted 3x already, so the only annual edition title is an orphan. Delete as commercial spam of an unnotable event. Legacypac (talk) 22:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Coffret 4 CD[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted, G7, by GB fan (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) -- Tavix (talk) 23:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean or refer to. Google search results are giving me a compilation (I think?) by Franck Pourcel. BDD (talk) 14:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete (overspecific redirect): looks like Coffret is a French CD publisher, who published, inter alia, a 4 CD compilation of Rihanna songs. Lavateraguy (talk) 16:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete is was a compilation release, I created a redirect in case anything came up of it. But it's not needed anymore.  — Calvin999 17:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Whipping My Hair[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. The 3rd item has an obvious consensus to delete. The first two could either be deleted or retargeted to Whip My Hair as {{R from incorrect name}}, so it's a "consensus unclear but everyone wants it changed, default to delete". Deryck C. 17:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another alleged single of Rihanna's not mentioned anywhere. The first two could be seen as incorrect names for Whip My Hair, but obviously not the last one. --BDD (talk) 14:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question Why not the last one? I'm undecided on whether they are plausible redirects or not, but I don't see why we would do anything other than keep or delete all of them? Thryduulf (talk) 16:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It does look like this song exists, even if it's not on Wikipedia. (There are such dedicated editors who work on pop songs that I'm reasonably certain we'd have an article if it were notable.) It's not the same song as "Whip My Hair", which is not by Rihanna, but I'm saying "Whipping My Hair" could perhaps be treated as a reader not remembering the exact title of Willow Smith's song. But anyone who includes "(Rihanna Song)" in their search is definitely looking for the latter, and we can't help them with that. It looks like "Whip My Hair" earned Smith comparisons with Rihanna, but I don't see any evidence that anyone would actually think it was by her. --BDD (talk) 17:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Emergency room (song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. Deryck C. 20:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In 2008, this was a rumored single for Rihanna, but it turned out to not even be her; see D.N.A. (Mario album). Emergency room (disambiguation) doesn't list any songs, and the Mario recording didn't even appear on any albums, so it sort of feels like any attention given to this is WP:UNDUE. But that album would probably be the place to retarget the first item. The second is less certain, and would definitely need {{R from incorrect name}} if retained; the third just seems completely wrong, with no indication that Akon was involved with the track or popularly thought to be. --BDD (talk) 14:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Romans 1:27[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 16#Romans 1:27

Compassion of God[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Compassion#Religious and spiritual views and keep, respectively. I strongly encourage someone to add "Rumjal" to Ramiel, lest we see it at RfD again. --BDD (talk) 15:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This was tagged for deletion on November 19th, but never listed in the logs. I presume it was to be added to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 November 19#Evening of God, where Legacypac's rationale was "Incorrect, various languages, created to build edit and page creation count." -- Tavix (talk) 05:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the sake of developing consensus, I'm fine with keeping Rumjal as an alternative transliteration of Ramiel. I would be surprised if Rumjal (Dungeons & Dragons) survived AfD, and as Rossami notes above, a hatnote should clear up any confusion. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 15:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 10:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ScreenCrush[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:01, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"ScreenCrush" is a movie website unmentioned in the target article (and apparently never mentioned, even at the time of the redirect's creation). ScreenCrush seems to be one of many, many websites owned or acquired by this media company, and from a news search unlikely to deserve even a fragment of a sentence in the company article. McGeddon (talk) 09:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Diamonds tour[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. Edit history shows this originally described that tour, which at one point was redirected to Rihanna for notability concerns. As there's an article on the tour again, retargeting there is a no-brainer. The edit history also mentions another redirect in the same situation; I'll also fix that one and check for others like it. --BDD (talk) 14:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose retargeting to Diamonds World Tour. sst✈ 05:36, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

History of the Jews in Somalia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to History of the Jews in Africa#Somalia. --BDD (talk) 15:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We have "history of the Jews" articles for many countries, and I don't see any reason we shouldn't have one for Somalia. I propose deleting this redirect so that the redlink can prompt someone to create an article, rather than having this pointed to an article on a small clan that may or may not have Jewish ancestry. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 04:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No objection.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC) (formerly User:Felix Folio Secundus[reply]
  • Delete to redlink as there has to be a topic here. Legacypac (talk) 22:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to create a redlink. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 07:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to History_of_the_Jews_in_Africa#Somalia were I will put a sourced sentence that says there are no history of Jews or current population of Jews in Somalia other than the Yibir. It turns out there is no topic here, which really surprised me. Legacypac (talk) 22:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Legacypac. As there are multiple "History of the Jews in $country" articles, almost(?) any country is a plausible search term. That there is no history of Jews in Somalia doesn't change this, we educate our readers to this effect at the proposed target. Thryduulf (talk) 03:16, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Naked taco[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably a low-carb alternative to a regular taco, this dining option isn't exclusive to Chipotle or mentioned at its article. --BDD (talk) 03:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I say either delete or retarget to Ralph Pagano, who operates a restaurant called "Naked Taco" (this fact is mentioned at his article), but I don't have particularly strong feelings about this. I think the benefit of deleting is that it would incentivize someone to make an article about naked tacos, but then again, people may also be searching for Pagano's restaurant. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 07:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:XY and/or WP:REDLINK. The best retargeting option for this redirect would be a subject related to salad or taco salad (I may change my opinion later if I think the connection is strong enough.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Common willdypop[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find any evidence that this is a common name for the plant Acanthus mollis or that it ever refers to anything else. Plantdrew (talk) 01:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The jealous one[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greek mythology meaning too general. Legacypac (talk) 12:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak dabify to Megaera and the The Thirty-Six Dramatic Situations where the "Jealous one" is one of the key figures in #32 of the situations. It's also a preemptive redlink for the 1942 Turkish film Kıskanç (The Jealous One) by Muhsin Ertuğrul --Lenticel (talk) 02:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:18, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete as more Neelix junk. Mangoe (talk) 19:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don’t disambiguate. If there were not a dramatic situation involving a jealous one, this redirect would be deleted without contest as yet another useless Neelix redirect. So there is no reason to include Megaera on a disambiguation page for this. Gorobay (talk) 19:33, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Should we disambiguate or delete? I should also note that "because Neelix" is not a valid deletion rationale - the "Neelix injunction" only permits editors to nominate redirects for deletion in the sense of WP:BRD. Deryck C. 00:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 00:05, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambig. The creator is irrelevant, and both targets are plausible. Thryduulf (talk) 16:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Gorobay. Magaera is NOT known as "the jealous one" anywhere, that is simply the English translation of that name, which, we have decided in multiple RFD's are not plausible search terms. That would leave retargeting to The Thirty-Six Dramatic Situations, but that would be a WP:SURPRISE. This isn't like a play with a character of "the jealous one", but more of a teaching aid where a certain character in other works can be represented as a jealous one. Since it's just an abstract idea, it would be analogous to retargeting to jealousy, which I would actually support more than a retarget to Situation #32. Now, my Google searches overwhelmingly show songs and other media with that name, so I would reckon that someone searching for "the jealous one" would be looking for something along those lines. Therefore, deleting is the most helpful course of action for our readers. -- Tavix (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment given the many RfDs we have found these translations are not good redirects, I still prefer deletion. Legacypac (talk) 22:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_7&oldid=1142587026"