Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 August 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 28[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 28, 2016.

Socio-economies[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 September 6#Socio-economies

Inaction[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both. JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inaction often refers to when a person fails to act when some action is required or expected. I don't see fatigue as the only possible meaning here. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 17:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not seeing "inaction" defined as an actual legal term there though--Lenticel (talk) 09:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Going to fatigue is a bit of a surprise, unless they use that term a lot in describing the condition, which it doesn't seem like because it's not listed among the synonyms. What about paralysis? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another vaguely suitable target is Idle, and I'm also wondering if there wouldn't be a relevant topic going under some personality disorder (not sure which one though) .At any rate, all this is getting us deeper into WP:XY territory. Uanfala (talk) 22:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Internally[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This word generally is used in medicine in my understanding, not economics. Nominated Internals separately due to different usages of that form Oiyarbepsy (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Internals[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 September 7#Internals

Conservative Government 1979-1997[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rather purposeless redirect, i.e. ministers appointed post-Thatcher are excluded (under Major, from November 1990). --Neve–selbert 16:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Conservative Government 1979–1990[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. --BDD (talk) 15:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Premiership of Margaret Thatcher. Redirect originally created from a merge into List of Thatcher ministers 1979–90. --Neve–selbert 16:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Secret State Police[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep but add hatnote to target. JohnCD (talk) 15:19, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This was not the only secret state police Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Secret police. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but add a hatnote. There are and were indeed many different secret police organisations, but the Gestapo are the only one to bear this name (the article starts "The Gestapo (German pronunciation: [ɡeˈstaːpo, ɡəˈʃtaːpo] ( listen)), abbreviation of Geheime Staatspolizei, or the Secret State Police,..."). Searching for the exact phrase on Google there is one hit about an alleged new department set up by George W. Bush to spy on Americans, and after several pages blogs comparing lack of transparency in the RCMP and Virginia State Police to secret police departments. Everything else is about the Gestapo meaning it is overwhelmingly the primary topic for this name. Thryduulf (talk) 08:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and add a hatnote pointing to Secret police per Thryduulf --Lenticel (talk) 09:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_August_28&oldid=1088110099"