Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 August 22

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 22[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 22, 2016.

Ballarat funicular[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 15:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Sovereign mine tram was incorrectly labelled as a funicular, The defining aspect of a funicular is that the trains/trams are connected to the same cable so that they each act as a counter balance. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funicular The trams in the Sovereign Hill inclined tramway are each driven by separate cables, and so are technically inclined lifts, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funicular#Inclined_lift David.moreno72 16:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Whether it is technically a funicular or not doesn't matter, what matters is whether people call it one and Google suggests that they do. The redirect is too new and has been nominated for deletion for such a large percentage of its life so far that page view statistics are not going to be a reliable indicator of how much this is used in practice, so I suggest keeping for at least 3-6 months after this discussion closes and then review it in the light of the then-available information about how it is used. Thryduulf (talk) 19:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 20:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alternative Seminary[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These are Neelix redirects, but I think they need discussion. The title is mentioned at the target, but not in detail and only that he is "part of" it. Google searches suggest that there is such a thing as The Alternative Seminary which Claiborne is associated with, and there are no other uses of the term as a noun phrase. Is it enough? I don't know. Thryduulf (talk) 13:28, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Hopefully it won't come to this, but Thryduulf, what would you like to happen absent input?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 20:39, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Article suggests he only teaches at The Alternative Seminary, but it is not clear it is one of his major works or collaborations. Is he putting that organization on the map in terms of notability? See [1] where he is listed as one of the teachers. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC) updated AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WP:RFCA[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retargeted since there were no objections. -- Tavix (talk) 15:29, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/All. Apparently the current target of this redirect was originally named at the title Wikipedia:Request for copyright assistance, so that this shortcut made sense. However, the target has been moved eight years ago, and this shortcut should now direct to the same page as WP:RFC/A does. Pppery (talk) 20:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_August_22&oldid=1088110158"