Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 November 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 1[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 1, 2015.

George Washington Carver High School (Alabama) (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete at request of creator. Risker (talk) 02:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With two parentheticals it's extremely unlikely someone would search this. It's also a double redirect, as the target points to a dab page itself. LittleWink (talk) 21:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Morning After (Maureen McGovern) (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete at request of creator. Risker (talk) 02:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With two parentheticals it's extremely unlikely someone would search this. It's also a double redirect, as the target points to a dab page itself. LittleWink (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nunnery[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 November 9#Nunnery

South-Africa Chambers of Commerce[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedily deleted as WP:R3 by User:Sadads. (non-admin closure) by Si Trew (talk) 14:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This was a fictitious government agency used in an email scam in 2004. It was prodded and subsequently redirected, but since it's not mentioned anywhere, it's confusing at best. -- Tavix (talk) 16:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Sadads: I'm not sure why this was speedy deleted. WP:R3 doesn't apply as this wasn't recently created (in fact, it's been around since 2004). -- Tavix (talk) 18:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sarah pkrakash[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this person has no significance and isn't mentioned in the article. It's a possible WP:BLP violation as it implies she's a scammer and there's no sources to back it up. -- Tavix (talk) 16:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per below. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as offensive or abusive. I'm thinking that the redirect implies that so and so is a scammer --Lenticel (talk) 00:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target. I'm not sure it's a BLP violation as I can't find anyone named "Sarah pkrakash". Si Trew (talk) 01:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Netflix and Chill[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neologism ([1]) that is not mentioned in the target article. sst✈discuss 15:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Meh. The problem with that is that (nearly) all of the entries in the list already have an article. I don't think an article could be written about this. If I'm wrong, then WP:REDLINK. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
True. I'll go with delete per WP:REDLINK then (or at least until it's described somewhere). -- Tavix (talk) 18:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep it should be mentioned in the cultural effects section. The replacement for going out on a date is prominent though recent development. We just need to add something to the article. I don't think it should be a separate article, so no WP:REDLINK should occur. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 16:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lolly Debattista[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close as it has been converted to an article. (non-admin closure) -- Tavix (talk) 18:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soft redirects to other language wikis are generally not considered useful on the English WP. - MrX 12:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete to encourage article creation --Lenticel (talk) 14:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to encourage article creation, or translate the German page. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:REDLINK one would suppose as a general case that if an article exists in another languge, that one can be created in English; also redirecting to non-English content does not help English-speakers, as the only language in common for all users is English. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 09:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural close, please, as I've converted it into a stub article (from the Italian and German; the Maltese is actually the stubbiest). TSi Trew (talk) 13:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    No objection. Thanks for translating it.- MrX 17:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mr. Jimoh Adams[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this person has no significance and isn't mentioned in the article. It's a possible WP:BLP violation as it implies he's a scammer and there's no sources to back it up. -- Tavix (talk) 03:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per WP:RFD#D2 confusing. I'm not sure they're technically a BLP since there is no B. Si Trew (talk) 06:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per Tavix.- MrX 14:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Tavix. If Jimoh Adams is a living person, these are BLP violations. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as offensive or abusive. I'm thinking that the redirect implies that so and so is a scammer --Lenticel (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh absolutely, but I think that's covered by WP:RNEUTRAL, not WP:BLP, cos I think it's a stretch to say that a page title is a biography. But that's just nit-picking on my part. In any case, two of these don't meet WP:TITLE. Si Trew (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_November_1&oldid=1219402815"