Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 May 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 10[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 10, 2015.

Frederick William Birrell[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. Safiel (talk) 17:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I declined speedy deletion on this as invalid, but it does appear that a discussion is warranted on possibly finding a better target for this redirect. Safiel (talk) 17:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is a redirect created in obvious error and should have been speedied per process. Frederick William Birrell was one politician. Frederick Ronald Birrell was another politician of a different era. Frederick Ronald Birrell is clearly not Frederick William Birrell. It doesn't need to be redirected anywhere: it needs to be deleted so the correct redlinks display for Frederick William Birrell. I am pretty unimpressed that an uncontroversial error was sent to RfD, and would like this reconsidered so I can move on with fixing this set of articles. The Drover's Wife (talk) 17:42, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American Spanish.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to American Spanish. --BDD (talk) 13:33, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No articles reference this page and no article development has occurred referencing it. MikeylitoTALK  16:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I re-signed this with my nick as I hadn't realised I was not logged in. Sorry about that. Si Trew (talk) 04:17, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget - to American Spanish as suggested, which disambigs the two things the reader might be lookin' for. WilyD 10:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The period makes it an implausible redirect and the page traffic has been minimal. - Eureka Lott 21:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per WilyD. Elassint Hi 04:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to the DAB per WilyD, and mark as {{Redirect to disambiguation page}} if we do. Si Trew (talk) 04:13, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

brittany speers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Brittany Spears. --BDD (talk) 13:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

retarget to Brittany Spears ; there's only 1-letter typo away from "Brittany Spears" but there is many more typos to go to Britney. I tried to ask for a hatnote at talk:Britney Spears to handle this, but they disagree with having hatnotes to handle things, so I figure it's best to just change the redirect instead, in that case. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 10:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to be pedantic, Brittany is a spear (geography) off the coast of Northern France, but let's face it, Britney Spears is patently WP:PRIMARY. Retarget, with 65.94. Si Trew (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gymn[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gymnasium. --BDD (talk) 13:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is simply an (incorrect) transliteration of гимн, which nonetheless means merely "anthem". - TheChampionMan1234 06:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to the DAB at Gymnasium- Am I an idiot? In British English this is an abbreviation for "Gymnasium" in the sense of a place where people practice kinda athletics, although that apparently is Gym, but we have all senses there at that DAB. Si Trew (talk) 14:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as is, it's an inappropriate foreign language redirect, as per nom it is a generic term rather than a nation-specific reference, and foreign language redirects of generic terms are generally not kept. Gym is a possible use, but "gymn" or "gymno-" are also prefixes for things which have to do with early childhood education or learning disabilities, according to Google, as well as referring to parts of a flower along with the scientific names of many species, and also a character from Dragon Keeper. Search results would be better here. Ivanvector (talk) 14:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm really not sure about that, Ivan. In Greek, gymnos literally means naked, as any fule kno, but I am not sure with the N at the end whether this is useful or harmful. The N is essentially silent, sure, (not quite but nearly) but I think this would be a useful search term towards the DAB. Si Trew (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't patently disagree, but I am going to strike my comment. Try typing "gymn" into the search box and you end up with a list of a huge number of articles where "gymn-forum.net" has been used as a source, so the search results aren't actually useful at all. Consider me neutral while I think about this some more. Ivanvector (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how common it is in British English, it might just be my schoolmaster who insisted on the final N. Merriam_Webster and other online dictionaries list it as a prefix ("gymn-") but not a word in itself, at Yahoo! Answers (which I know is not WP:RS) there is a question "Do you spell 'gym' as gym or gymn where the respondents seem to indicate that in British English it has the N and in American English does not. Si Trew (talk) 05:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

South Africa 1900[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to 1900 in South Africa. --BDD (talk) 13:23, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a redirect, I think this would be better off at 1900 in South Africa than the Second Boer War because the war wasn't the only thing that happened in South Africa in 1900. However, it's also the name of a battle honour of the British Army which is the current reason why it's redirected there (even though the article makes no mention of any battle honours...) I don't think that's a good reason to have it redirected there, if anything it's a reason to delete per WP:REDLINK to encourage article creation. Thoughts? Tavix | Talk  04:47, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2013 USA Pro Challenge[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per criterion G7 by GB fan. Steel1943 (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2013 USA Pro Challenge doesn't necessarily mean a cycling challenge. Compassionate727 (talk) 22:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are there other "USA Pro Challenge"s? Ivanvector (talk) 14:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
U.S. Open is a DAB, and would seem an obvious response to that one. (gets map, gets ruler and compasses, finds 49th parallel). Si Trew (talk) 15:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_May_10&oldid=1138580532"