Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 February 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 1[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 1, 2015.

Charles O&[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete these redirects from encoding problems. ⟨Charles O&⟩, for example, is short for ⟨Charles O'Brien (colonial governor)⟩, but everything after the ⟨#⟩ was cut off because Wikipedia treats that as a section link. Gorobay (talk) 16:56, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Roger Collingwood[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedied - target was Robin. [Additional comments.] Peridon (talk) 14:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Roger" not mentioned in target 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 15:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

probably, mea culpa. I use that reason as search request from lv:Māksla--Albedo @ 18:26, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

London Lights[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted per WP:R#DELETE, criteria #10. Redirects to article fully protected until 18 Feb 2015, nothing in article about "London Lights" (which I assume is the name of a song). -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 14:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: it seems to be a duet with Harry Styles, maybe it can be mentioned on the page. Siuenti (talk) 14:56, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've started a discussion at Talk:Meghan_Trainor#London_Lights Siuenti (talk) 14:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not a duet, as we both now know. Still, no mention of it in the article, that should qualify this redirect to be deleted. Can't figure if the person who created it is wanting to start an article on it or just wants some promotion for Trainor and the song. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 00:07, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anyway it doesn't look like it's going to be mentioned so delete unless that happens. Siuenti (talk) 22:32, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Strange metal[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 February 9#Strange metal

2023 in the United States[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was all speedy deleted WP:CSD#G7 at author's request. JohnCD (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

6 S3[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, despite the fact it was a popular redlink. Not mentioned at target, and it's not clear from Google search results that this means anything in particular. Siuenti (talk) 10:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as not being mentioned at the target article, and since the Google search returns results that vary from being a hack that can be done on the iOS for the Samsung Galaxy S3, to a battery that is used for the Acer Aspire. In other words, the term is too ambiguous to be helpful. Steel1943 (talk) 19:57, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as vague --Lenticel (talk) 00:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Crazy in Love (Be...ncé Knowles song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Unopposed. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely unlikely search term, replacing three letters with periods. If it were the letter with a diacritic, that might be understandable, but this? WP:RFD#DELETE #8. BDD (talk) 05:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:RDF#D8, but not sure what you mean by "the letter with a diacritic", an ellipsis? Isn't it only two letters that are replaced ("yo")? Si Trew (talk) 12:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I meant if the omitted character was the é, i.e., Crazy in Love (Beyonc. Knowles song), I would at least be able to guess why it exists. --BDD (talk) 15:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

PÄ“rkons[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete mojibake. Gorobay (talk) 04:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Extremaduran (línguistics)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 February 9#Extremaduran (línguistics)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_February_1&oldid=1142587242"