Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 December 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 28[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 28, 2015.

Tobacco (Last Week Tonight with John Oliver)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Let the DRV resolve first. Discussion should take place there. --BDD (talk) 22:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per the comment by Calton under Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 December 24#Tobacco (Last Week Tonight with John Oliver), which says Restore original title as protected redirect, delete new title completely.. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Support for Axis Powers during World War II[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:35, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support does not equal collaboration. See two more batches that rolled into tomorrow as well. Legacypac (talk) 22:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Newt Leroy Gingrich[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by DGG. (non-admin closure) -- Tavix (talk) 08:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It does not look like he ever went by these names, making them very unlikely search terms only Neelix would find useful. Legacypac (talk) 22:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CSD'd as an old implausible Neelix redirect. --Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 00:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Classicistically[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by DGG. (non-admin closure) -- Tavix (talk) 08:42, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another fake Neelix word. How would someone use this in a sentence? Legacypac (talk) 22:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's classicistically awesome. Legacypac (talk) 23:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
CSD'd as an old implausible Neelix redirect. --Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 00:31, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete implausible redirect. sst✈ 01:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Party-systems[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. This is an interesting closure: Almost all nominated items have been challenged, but all items have a majority favouring deletion. "Party-system" is borderline, but it has been pointed out that search engines treat hyphens as equivalent to spacebars, so the general conclusion is that this does not help readers either. Deryck C. 23:28, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Party systemic makes no sense for redirect. No one talks about a party system this way. Sticking two words together not correct either. Neelix redirects. Legacypac (talk) 21:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hypenated ones do not aid search at all. Search engines ignore the hyphen - try it on site or Google. No value in keeping incorrect variations like this. Legacypac (talk) 18:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Partyistic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Boing! said Zebedee. --BDD (talk) 14:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Made up word by Neelix. Best source is http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Partyistic which has nothing to do with the current target and it pretty stupid Legacypac (talk) 21:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Partyingly[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Boing! said Zebedee. --BDD (talk) 14:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fake Neelix word. Delete Legacypac (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fumed[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Fume. --BDD (talk) 22:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe an X:Y. Target is not correct. Means 1. emit gas, smoke, or vapor. or 2. feel, show, or express great anger. Legacypac (talk) 21:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Perfumedly[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 6#Perfumedly

Abbreviationally[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much fake words made up by Neelix - improbable search terms Legacypac (talk) 21:14, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Screams with his hands on his face[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect just describes the film's poster. FallingGravity (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • This redirect was not created by Neelix. -- Tavix (talk) 01:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Tavix: You're right, thanks. --Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 01:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hissy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to tantrum. All participants in this discussion agree that this redirect should be changed, with a slight majority favouring retargeting to tantrum. Deryck C. 23:24, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear what this refers to. Nothing like "Hissy" is mentioned at the target article, nor was it when the redirect was created. The creator was indef'd. I'm not sure why. --BDD (talk) 17:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak retarget to Tantrum since Hissy fit redirects there. I have never heard the word "hissy" used in any other context as a standalone word that refers to a specific topic. Steel1943 (talk) 18:14, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, since no-one is realistically going to search for this. The distorted logic behind this redirect is that Hissy is the name of one of the Cacodemons in the Doom videogames, but I can't imagine anyone actually using it as a search term. ‑ Iridescent 21:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to List of Beanie Babies#Hissy the Snake as {{R to list entry}}. "Hissy the Snake" is specifically named and referred to as "Hissy", while hissy fit isn't used without "fit". The word isn't present in the Cacodemon article or the Doom articles. There is a small mention of a character named Hissy in the Legion of Super-Pets article, but it seems limited to single episode of another show, where it was parodied.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 23:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to tantrum. I have heard people use the word "hissy" as an adjective to describe the state of being in a "hissy fit" (e.g., "don't get hissy with me, young man"). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to tantrum per Notecardforfree.
@BDD: The user was ARBCOM blocked and is globally blocked; the last block on enwiki that wasn't to change the settings of the same block read "Disruptive editing: Rapid creation of 4 to 6 inappropriate pages per minute for extended time - although stopped now, this may be indicative that user may be using automated tools to create pages, or acct compromise". --Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 01:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sunshade[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Deryck C. 23:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd guess that an overwhelming majority (probably 100%) of people searching for Sunshade are expecting an article about parasols, not a page of sci-fi speculation about controlling the Earth's temperature by means of launching 16 trillion satellites to blot out the sun.  ‑ Iridescent 17:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It matches what most Wikipedians would think of though. Legacypac (talk) 18:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Personally, I think of a certain type of awning. (There is a plural version as well. Since they should go to the same place, I've added it.) -- Tavix (talk) 21:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • It could also legitimately refer to those big sheets of cardboard you block car windows with in hot climates. Given that all the legitimate variations I can think of are variants of "device to keep cool", retargeting to Shade (shadow) would probably be the most sensible option, loath as I am to point readers to an article so poor. ‑ Iridescent 21:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tricon Global Restaurants Incorporated[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All incorrectly spelled, and redirects differentiated by slight punctuation differences are ignored by search engines. Partial title matches clutter up search too. Just clean them out. Legacypac (talk) 15:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep all. These aren't misspelled; they are plausible search variations of "Inc. --> Incorporated", as well as variations of the titles with/without punctuation. Thus, these are all plausible search terms. Steel1943 (talk) 17:06, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. These are not all the redirects to the target, just the ones I deemed redundent as minor variations that make search harder. All the Yum ones are misspellings as they lack the ! which is an important part of the name. Legacypac (talk) 17:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly disagree with the second sentence. The exclamation point arguably fails MOS:TM. People don't regularly yell when they say "Yum Brands". --BDD (talk) 17:57, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all - They are reasonable redirects per above.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 04:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the ones that have "incorporated" in the title. It's unusual to see Inc. spelled out like that and even rarer for it to be searched for in that fashion. (At least it isn't a GmbH...) Keep the rest per above as they aren't misspelled. -- Tavix (talk) 05:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all Seem like reasonable redirects to me. SQLQuery me! 06:50, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pharisaists[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep, keep, and delete, respectively. --BDD (talk) 21:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pharisæus is not an English word. Pharisaist is barely an English word, excessively obscure. Pharisaists is even more obscure (under 400 ghits) and supposed meaning is unclear from my searches. Neelix specials. Legacypac (talk) 14:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Pharisæus, and keep the others. "Pharisaism" is relatively commonly encountered (see the creator's comment), and Pharisaist(s) would be a reasonable form of the same title, but I'm not particularly sure what "Pharisæus" even is, aside from the Latin meaning that we ought to ignore because the Pharisees aren't and weren't a group particularly associated with the Romans or the Latin language. Nyttend (talk) 02:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rubbish computer, I think you meant to say the opposite. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 01:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Notecardforfree, I've fixed my vote now. --Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 01:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fma characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Steel1943 (talk) 02:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems misleading, especially since the series Fullmetal Alchemist is not on disambiguation page FMA and the series isn't labeled by that acronym. Steel1943 (talk) 05:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as vague at best --Lenticel (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomimator comment: Around this time, I struck out part of my nomination statement that I realized was false (that I did not notice when I was writing the nomination statement.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The formatting is bad, but is there anything else this could really refer to? --BDD (talk) 03:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • @BDD: I get what you are implying here. On a related note, after I realized what I struck out in my nomination statement, I wanted to withdraw this nomination since I am now rather neutral, but I cannot since there is a "delete" vote present. Steel1943 (talk) 16:48, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. It's weak because of the formatting, but since nothing else at FMA could logically have "characters," it's unambiguous. -- Tavix (talk) 08:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Lenticel: Would you be okay if I withdraw this nomination? Steel1943 (talk) 17:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – best target for now. sst✈ 18:40, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm cool with that. --Lenticel (talk) 02:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Peep Bowling[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The general rule is that we don't keep redirects from related concepts that aren't mentioned in the target at all. Deryck C. 23:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect has nothing to do with the video game except through fan videos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoshiman6464 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 28 December 2015‎

  • Keep per WP:REDIRECTSARECHEAP. This is a plausible enough redirect and the concept of Peep Bowling originated out of the Roller Coaster Tycoon games themselves. Safiel (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as misleading, since this concept isn't described at the target. (as an aside: Bowling with Peeps seems like a fun Easter activity!) -- Tavix (talk) 17:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not gonna be searched for and not gonna be found at the target. Legacypac (talk) 04:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

MGTOW (Men's rights)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 6#MGTOW (Men's rights)

God Manifest[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Manifestation of God. --BDD (talk) 21:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An English translation of a heathen king's name is not the obvious place to direct this phrase. Manifestation of God is one possible target, but God manifest is a theme in the Bible and a direct reference to Jesus Christ. Delete as ambiguous or target to Names and titles of Jesus in the New Testament where the Biblical idea should be covered but is not currently. Legacypac (talk) 16:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to first, and perhaps liking the second within the first. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 21:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Godsy(TALKCONT) 04:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dear Harbor[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 21:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No one refers to Deer Lake as Dear Lake, I miss you so much my darling. When can we be together again? Love Boat Legacypac (talk) 04:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I dunno. Redirects are cheap, and it seems possible that some non-zero number of users (ESL users, for instance) might confute "Deer" and "Dear" when searching. What problem is solved by deleting this redirect? Herostratus (talk) 07:19, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep WP:CHEAP {{R from typo}} single letter typo and cognition mistake -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep "Dear" does sound like "Deer". Probably as a plausible misspelling--Lenticel (talk) 02:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Plausible errors and exactly the kind of thing that redirects are for. Rossami (talk) 01:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Putting on[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Way too general a phrase to be a redirect to this target. Neelix list Legacypac (talk) 04:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

James Welbore[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Some of these were already deleted by DGG, Deb, and Versageek. --BDD (talk) 15:15, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search terms that mix and matching versions of the targets name, Legacypac (talk) 03:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

River of hate[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 07:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not at target Legacypac (talk) 03:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. In Greek mythology, the River Styx was the river of hate (see this source). The article for Hades explains that Styx was one five rivers in hades, each associated with a unique symbolic meaning. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fool's fires[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neelix corruption of the Latin root Legacypac (talk) 03:40, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Joaquim Mulembwe[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 6#Joaquim Mulembwe

Seppo Paakkönen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assorted random placements of the little dots above letters. Highly unlikely search terms created by Neelix Search engines just treat these all the same so they serve no use. Legacypac (talk) 03:19, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep {{R from typo}} they seem to be various typos in omitting the accent above the letters, which would seem to be plausible typos -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all since this is the English Wikipedia, so incorrect use of diacritics is highly unlikely. Steel1943 (talk) 16:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Incorrect due to omission of diacritics would seem to be very likely in English, since English doesn't used diacritics at all, making diacritic errors something that English-speakers would make -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. More Neelix nonsense. Softlavender (talk) 21:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as highly implausible typos; looking at page views, it doesn't look as if English speakers (or any speakers) are making errors like this. Sideways713 (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ratty (railway)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 6#Ratty (railway)

Rowl[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some weird combination of the actors first and middle name and a Neelix redirect based on the guy's middle name Legacypac (talk) 03:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak retarget "Dowl" to Dowel as a {{R from typo}} -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. More Neelix nonsense. Softlavender (talk) 21:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unhelpful redirect from partial match; a guy with this middle name is hardly more likely to be where searchers expect to end up than any of the other partial matches or search results on these short strings of letters. Also, any {{R from typo}} here would have an Wp:XY problem; e.g. dowl could be a letter-omission typo for dowel, but just as likely an off-by-one-key typo for fowl. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 12:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_28&oldid=1037882171"