Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 April 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 25[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 25, 2015.

Destiny's Child World Tour 2010[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Alas, this was too bootylicious for the world. --BDD (talk) 13:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This should have been deleted as WP:TOOSOON back in 2009... Tavix  Talk  20:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Beyonk[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:40, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing any connection between this redirect and Beyonce. Tavix  Talk  20:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as implausible synonym or Retarget to Beyond as a possible typo.--Lenticel (talk) 23:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete as unhelpful and possibly a slur. Seyasirt (talk) 12:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Typo doesn't seem likely on a QWERTY (or AZERTY or other layout): keys are on different hands and even a two-finger typist would not miss by that much, but maybe on some mobile device or something they are close. Doing a gsearch, there appear to be a lot of people of some kind of East Asian ethnicity (judging solely by the pictures, big racist I am) who call themselves this on various social networking websites, but I can't work out whether it is a real name or is just used as a nickname. (I don't subscribe to those sites and do not want to.) Si Trew (talk) 08:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2020s (Timeline of Montreal history)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:40, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unhelpful because the Timeline of Montreal history has no events listed in the 2020s. It's also implausible as a search term. Tavix  Talk  20:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

User:Qualrus[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 May 4#User:Qualrus

Colorado Springs Crusaders[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore. I'll leave the next step for someone else. --BDD (talk) 16:18, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You can find the AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaska Quake. Tavix | Talk  05:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unhelpful, because it's not mentioned in the target article at all, and per WP:REDLINK to show that the article does not exist. Natg 19 (talk) 01:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore articles and take to AFD. I don't think any of these teams are notable, but I feel like you're skirting the process by redirecting them and then nominating for RFD a few months later. If the articles should be deleted, let's do it the normal way. Tavix  Talk  04:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore articles and take to AFD per User:Tavix. It's probably best to have these discussed at AfD so that you'll have a bigger number of editors to look at it. --Lenticel (talk) 01:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

John Madden (baseball)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. If this guy ever makes the majors, or whatever it takes to be considered notable, I'll be happy to restore the content instead of having someone start from scratch. Right now, it's misleading as a redirect. --BDD (talk) 13:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No longer listed on this page (or any page for that matter). Tavix  Talk  00:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Also fails WP:MLB/N, so we shouldn't have an article. - Eureka Lott 01:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • This redirect contains important history and should probably be retained. It was initially submitted as an AfC request and accepted by User:Empire3131. User:Fabrictramp declined a speed delete request on it before it was merged and redirected by User:Spanneraol. Had the merged content seems to have been removed without comment in April 2010 by User:209.158.191.254, the redirect would still be valid. - TB (talk) 11:35, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The redirect would not still be valid because the player is not currently in the Mets organization and hasnt been for several years. Spanneraol (talk) 13:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • It seems a bit counterintuitive to restrict an article to just a teams current minor players. If this really is the best way to curate this information, should there not be another article listing previous minor players to which information is moved rather than just being discarded? That would then be the natural target for this redirect. - TB (talk) 09:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Amendment 1-10 of the Constitution of India[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all useful. Ninney (talk) 00:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: implausible. Unlike the Bill of Rights, the first ten Indian Amendments don't seem to have any common or unifying theme. Besides, they would be amendements, not amendment. Tavix | Talk  20:22, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

25th Amendment of the Constitution of India[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget per WP:BRD. I'm being bold here, so feel free to revert/discuss if you think there should be a different result. (non-admin closure) Tavix  Talk  00:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article exist, refer Twenty-fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India. Redirecting the current target page is not useful. Ninney (talk) 00:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eighty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 May 4#Eighty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India

I have created an article and redirected this page to Eighty-sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India. InfernalH (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forty-Forth Amendment of the Constitution of India[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 May 4#Forty-Forth Amendment of the Constitution of India

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_April_25&oldid=1138579989"