Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 June 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 29[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 29, 2014.

Physiological and molecular wheat breeding[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Deletion is ruled out due to attribution issues and neither an alternative target nor an alternative name have been suggested. NAC. The Whispering Wind (talk) 16:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect target that doesn't make sense. The title too specific, the target too broad. Note that the page history includes content that currently is in a couple other articles, so a rename or history merge solution is required. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking rename first and then keep. Thoughts on that idea? Ego White Tray (talk) 02:29, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ego White Tray, what should it be moved to? --BDD (talk) 16:45, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I don't see any problems with this redirect. Both "physiological breeding" and "molecular breeding" are relevant terms, and they are applicable to wheat. This article should never have been created, but now we have a cpyright issue and no particular problems with article's name. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:44, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

G word[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gay is not the only "G word" and it's not especially mentioned in the article. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 15:21, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: plausible homophobic search term. The implication that the word "gay" may not be spoken in public might be offensive to homosexuals, but it is (unfortunately) not uncommon enough to make this search term implausible. I am not sure that it passes WP:NOTDICT though. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:16, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • I was looking to see if there was an article about G as used in hiphop slang (Nuthin' but a 'G' Thang) but came up with nothing, so I say delete. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete, as a so-called “homophobe” myself, i tell you that it is not a plausible search term. You seem to think that your “homophobes” think about gays all the time, which is not true. � (talk) 09:15, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate, there seems to be many other uses for this term, see http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=G-Word TheChampionMan1234 05:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, I don't think I've ever seen any other meaning of "G word" from that list. I don't live in English-speaking country though. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 11:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • You're joking, right, Champion? We're not urban dictionary, and none of those are credible enough to list on a disambig. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:42, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

User:Russavia/Pricasso (draft)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless redirect Darkness Shines (talk) 11:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This is the original name of the page, per the deletion and move histories: please refer these two diffs: [1] and [2]. As much as this title is odd, I have no desire to see attributions break. Steel1943 (talk) 15:37, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • FWIW deletion of this redirect won't break attribution: only care about edit history, which remains intact in target page anyway. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep: this redirect resides in "User:" namespace, and it is not offensive or misleading. Russavia knows better whether he needs it, and we are not entitled to decide for him. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Criticism of Falun Gong[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 19:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirect. I don't know where to retarget to, if there is no target, we should just delete it. TheChampionMan1234 09:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Burn folder[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Finder (software). --BDD (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know its a component of the OS, but the current target is misleading, yet the word 'burn' does not appear anywhere in the target. Also there are no related articles, I found this out by using Google to search WP see [3] TheChampionMan1234 09:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Finder (software), which handles the folder itself. I mentioned this feature there, so this redirect is now appropriate. It seems that the actual name is "Burn Folder" (with capital "F"), so I also suggest creating this redirect and pointing it to the same place. (I added non-existing Burn Folder redirect to this discussion; please don't create it until discussion ends.) — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 22:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Userbox maker[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate CNR TheChampionMan1234 09:48, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Current President of the United States[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 14:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this as no use retargeting to Barack Obama due to the fact of how it needs to be manually updated. TheChampionMan1234 09:46, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unless a reader is using a very large screen, this would be the only option that doesn't show them the current president right off the bat. I'm not sure this is such a good idea. --BDD (talk) 23:46, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, you are right of course so Keep. The Whispering Wind (talk) 01:13, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

虎[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I considered the retargeting proposal, but the character isn't used on that page. --BDD (talk) 18:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not especially Chinese. TheChampionMan1234 09:32, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Romans named Marcus Claudius Marcellus (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete and keep, respectively. Apologies if this feels like a supervote, but given the moving of the target page, the outcomes here seem clear. Deletion of the (disambiguation) title follows the new Fish Lake precedent, while the shorter title is the former page title. --BDD (talk) 18:59, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This term is unlikely to require disambiguation and the redirect isn't to a dab page. See related discussion Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_June_6#List_of_lakes_named_Fish_Lake_.28disambiguation.29. DexDor (talk) 06:15, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Urban luzon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep, without prejudice to separate nominations. --BDD (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Deletions of Typos in Page Titles. Zollerriia63 (talk) 05:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

IDon't[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Verizon Wireless#"There's A Map For That". --BDD (talk) 18:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be an advertisement that isn't mentioned in the article anymore Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 01:46, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_June_29&oldid=1037875047"