Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 July 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 4[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 4, 2014.

Kırım[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:15, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not especially Turkish TheChampionMan1234 10:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Russia Today (Information Agency)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this redirect. The redirection makes no sense, and are probably created to cause confusion between Rossiya Segodnya and the TV channel RT, which was known as Russia Today prior to its rebranding in 2009. Erlbaeko (talk) 09:42, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: combination of capitalization issues and rather uncommon "information agency" instead of "news agency" wording makes this title implausible. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talktrack) 09:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Russia Today[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 17:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page suffered from copy-paste page move attempt. The title is a previous name of RT TV network, which is probably still mostly known by this name. There is also Rossiya Segodnya news agency, whose name is translated as "Russia Today" from Russian, and Russian Federation Today. All three articles contain disambiguation hatnotes pointing to each other. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talktrack) 08:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Markup Renders as
{{subst:Redirect6/sandbox|Russia Today|news agency|Rossiya Segodnya}}
Which would be enough of disambiguation. Alternative option would be to speedy delete this redirect and move Russia Today (disambiguation) here. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talktrack) 09:03, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Russia Today as a disambiguation page to explain the alternative uses of the term "Russia Today". Imo the page Russia Today (disambiguation) may be deleted, but this type of redirect is used to indicate any intentional links to the disambiguation page, to distinguish them from accidental or erroneous incoming links that should be disambiguated to the appropriate article. Ref. WP:DABNAME. If a page incorrectly links to "Russia Today", but means the TV network RT, it should be corrected to use the new name (they changed name in 2009) like this RT (TV network) or like this RT. See Help:Disambiguation for correct use of disambiguation pages. Erlbaeko (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I believe you got me wrong. I mostly changed the redirection to a disambiguation page to clarify that RT and Rossiya Segodnya are two separate companies, and also to "force" users to use the correct name, since I have noticed that some users deliberately use the old name. Erlbaeko (talk) 13:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I get it. Although I don't really think this is indeed needed, my main problem is with the way you did it – you should have deleted redirect and then moved the disambiguation page. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talktrack) 13:58, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, sorry if I didn't follow a rule. I am not familiar with every policy. Erlbaeko (talk) 14:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert to redirect This should not be a disambiguation, because the person who converted it failed to fix the incoming links problem, and left the edit history at Russia Today (disambiguation), not properly attributing previous editors. Erlbaeko should have initiated a move request at talk:Russia Today (disambiguation) to deal with their contention that "Russia Today" has no primary topic. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I have reverted it to redirect while the topic is under discussion. Erlbaeko (talk) 08:36, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Work, Work[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Work Bitch (where Work Work redirects). --BDD (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that "Work, Work" is not the official title for Work (The Saturdays song) which is currently redirected to Chasing Lights. j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 03:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

''(ONe)''[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The supposedly album title of this article is (ONe) then this was moved to ''(ONe)'' (with its italic format two apostrophes on each sides) because this was unable to italicize the title. Then I made my request to move back to (ONe) but this was decided to move to One (The Panic Channel album) instead. Now I am considering this to delete because most people will unable to search that term. j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 03:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

All international sports events held in Sao Paulo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep, refining target to #International sports events. As the latter entry was merged there, its history needs to be preserved in all but extreme circumstances. The first could be deleted, but I believe bots create redirects from existing names minus the diacritics, so it may just get recreated. Given the lack of evidence that these redirects could be misleading or otherwise harmful, they stay. --BDD (talk) 16:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not covered. TheChampionMan1234 01:01, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is, at São Paulo#International sports events . The Whispering Wind (talk) 17:05, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.