Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 July 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 17[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 17, 2014.

XHSLW-TV[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:44, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Television station cannot be found in any Mexican sources. Consulting the reliable government source in Template:Mexico-inf does not turn up anything, and searching the cft.gob.mx domains does not add any further items. I'm fairly sure the concession got revoked because the callsign definitely looks right — a couple letters of the city and one of the state (Mexico assigned other W calls in Coahuila). Raymie (t • c) 19:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Internet Explorer 12[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:43, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTAL � (talk) 13:36, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Target article has nothing on this subject. It has always been like this: Someone creates a redirect or article about a version of a Microsoft product that is not even announced yet, while WP:CRYSTAL even forbids articles consisting purely of software announcements only. They are almost always deleted. But can we stop this redundant cycle? Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 14:40, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Codename Lisa. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 04:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Panda Géant[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:42, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not especially French. TheChampionMan1234 08:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eseupanya[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:40, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not especially Korean TheChampionMan1234 04:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:R#DELETE #8, and because transcriptions of foreign names normally written in other scripts are useful neither to native speakers of those languages (who would search in the original script) nor to English speakers (who would search in English). Also, this isn't the usual name of Spain in Korean anyway; on kowiki, it's a redirect that gets only about a dozen hits per day [1]. quant18 (talk) 13:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:FORRED. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ausfailia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:40, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what this is, anyway implausible typo. TheChampionMan1234 04:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I think it's a derogatory term. I'm reading it as Aus-fail-ia; There seems to be some usage in English for this term, but it appears to be in the automated vandalism filter, disallowing my linking to Google. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete derogatory. Mangoe (talk) 12:19, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per WP:RFD#DELETE Item 3. --Lenticel (talk) 04:57, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: be it obscure neologism or derogatory term, it should be deleted per WP:R#DELETE. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:37, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ilbo[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 August 1#Ilbo

Math tricks[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:38, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a generic topic. TheChampionMan1234 04:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of The Henry Danger episodes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Though perhaps implausible as a search term, there would appear to be no harm in keeping this. Since it's a former name of the article, however, there may be some harm in deleting it. --BDD (talk) 22:41, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect will never be a search target – there is no television series with the name "The Henry Danger" Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Timothy Galfas[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete - WP:REDLINK. TerriersFan (talk) 23:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Galfas did not only do the cinematography for The Lord of the Rings, but he has directed several films and was active as a screenwriter (currently four articles linking to the redirect, excluding the redirect target). In the target article, you'll only find his name once in the infobox, without any biographical information. So the reason "If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject" is clearly fulfilled. YMS (talk) 08:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete He has six director and six cinematography credits in IMDB, and while the Bakshi LotR is surely the best known of them them but there's obvious potential for a real article, and no reason to single out one film as a target. Mangoe (talk) 12:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete to make way for a potential article.--Lenticel (talk) 04:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:REDLINK -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:10, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: no good target for this redirect. I am not convinced WP:REDLINK applies here. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete While I have my doubts Galfas is notable it makes no sense to point to only one of his works. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 16:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_July_17&oldid=1039435075"