Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 September 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 13, 2013.

Trent Olsen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 16:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't need a redirect Lady Lotus (talk) 15:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment seems to be an older brother who is mentioned in the article. Siuenti (talk) 21:44, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - entirely normal to have a redirect to a nn relative mentioned in the target. The Whispering Wind (talk) 23:04, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Four T's[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Disambiguate. Ruslik_Zero 19:28, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The previous article at this title was deleted after discussion at AfD, and not suggested for redirection. There are too many different senses in which "The Four Ts" (with or without apostrophe) is used for this to be a sensible redirect. PamD 12:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate any other senses which are discussed in Wikipedia. In the meantime, keep as a likely search term for a topic discussed in the article. Siuenti (talk) 21:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate as a good, constructive solution. The Whispering Wind (talk) 23:07, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Disambiguate Pam, if you say there are "many different senses" then you are free to disambiguate them instead of just proposing to delete that redirect. --Dexter_prog (talk · contribs · count) @ 19:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • It appears we have consensus to dabify, but lacking from this discussion has been any other use of the term! I find consensus for this outcome and authorize anyone to close the discussion once the dabification is carried out; I'm afraid I can't. --BDD (talk) 16:20, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Siuenti, The Whispering Wind, any ideas? --BDD (talk) 16:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I've had a stab at a disambig. I only found two topics in Wikipedia which seemed likely search terms, + a link to 4T. I'd also like to include a link to the search result but I'm not sure how. Siuenti (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Hopefully I have reconstructed the page in a sound way. The Whispering Wind (talk) 01:26, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

MRRRRP[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFD#DELETE #8, almost nonsensical. AldezD (talk) 11:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, the article doesn't appear to have anything about this "topic". Siuenti (talk) 21:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Beulah the Buzzer? – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 22:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as confusing to the reader. The Whispering Wind (talk) 14:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Internal or fanon name for a sound effect that only TPiR fans seem to know the name of. Nate (chatter) 05:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not a plausible search term for a reader to try. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.