Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 June 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 13, 2013

Snark (punctuation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The readdition of content should be discussed at the target's talk page. Thryduulf (talk) 09:38, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The term "snark" is not used or mentioned in the target article; formerly it was, but the relevant section was removed in 2010 for sourcing/significance concerns. Seeing as how there's no link to the term "snark" in the article now, and the redirect is currently unused anyway, this redirect should be removed; a redirect with a parethesized dab thingy is nto going to behelpful outside of wikilinks, and there are no wikilinks where it could be used. Writ Keeper  20:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, The page was viewed 351 times back in April, so I think we should definitely keep it. Tideflat (talk) 00:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not mentioned at target, so no help to anyone who uses it. Siuenti (talk) 23:22, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and re-add the relevant content. It's clear from snark punctuation -wikipedia that there's warrant for it. --BDD (talk) 16:08, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brissalius caparti[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted by INeverCry. --BDD (talk) 05:28, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong redirect Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 19:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Luke Thomas[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, and move Luke Thomas (chef) there. --BDD (talk) 16:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At one time a child named Luke Thomas was killed at Eastern Commerce Collegiate Institute. That content was moved into the Eastern Commerce article, but has since been removed. Now we have a redirect from Luke Thomas to Eastern Commerce for no apparent reason. I think it makes sense to delete the redirect so the namespace is empty for new use. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:44, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.