Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 July 29

< July 28

July 30 >

July 29

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 29, 2013.

Cost to company

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was moved. --BDD (talk) 21:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

• Cost to company → Employment (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Deletion - 1. redirect serves no purpose, nothing in target explains or refers to the redirected term; 2. there is a parallel entry Cost to Company (upper case "Company"), which ideally should be deleted and moved to Wiktionary. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 15:31, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

• Retarget to Cost to Company as long as that exists (I've boldly done this). Suggest prodding Cost to Company to get them both deleted. Siuenti (talk) 22:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
• Move the article currently at Cost to Company to Cost to company per WP:NCCAPS. I don't really know anything about the Transwiki process but it seems to me that after being copied to Wiktionary the lower-case version should be overwritten with {{wi}} and the upper-case version should redirect there. – Arms & Hearts (talk)
• Move per Arms & Hearts – also I question why this concept of the cost of an entire employee package, which is almost always a company's largest and most notable expense, would not be able to become a viable, perhaps even a "good" article in this encyclopedia? – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 14:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.