Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 January 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 30[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 30, 2013

File:Winnipeg skyline.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 17:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shadows Commons Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Americans Against Arnold[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 17:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the concept on the target page. Americans Against Arnold seems to be a short-lived venture of Alex Jones. Even if it meets WP:GNG, it's worth deletion per WP:REDLINK. BDD (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:OnTheGroundsForSculpture.JPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 17:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shadows Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

मेfन्जा[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 17:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is meant to be a redirect from an alternative language. However, there is a Latin letter lurking amongst the Devanagari; I think it might be a typo for मोन्जा. User:NotWith added the misspelling to the target article as the Nepali name. No source was given. If no source can be found, and no proper spelling emerges from this discussion, I propose deletion. Gorobay (talk) 17:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Of the several hits found by Google all but one are clearly sourced from Wikipedia. The exception is [1], where it is not at all clear. It appears to get some use, but it's too new for this to be very accurate. I'm tempted to say weak keep but tag as {{R from misspelling}} and come back to it in several months time (at least 3-4, better 6 or more) to see what, if any, use its getting long term. Thryduulf (talk) 18:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Almost certainly a typo, and a completely implausible one at that. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Psychic TV/PTV3 - Mr Alien Brain vs. The Skinwalkers (CD & DVD, 2X12") (2008)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_Zero 17:47, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is a jumble of information that includes the band name, the album name, the format, and the release year. Doesn't seem like a correct search term possibility. —Torchiest talkedits 04:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Pretty implausible search term. --Cerebellum (talk) 04:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This was the original article title, and a year after it was moved it is still getting over 100 hits every month, which very strongly suggests that it is linked from somewhere external to Wikipedia. Deleting the redirect will therefore be significantly harmful while bringing no benefits. Thryduulf (talk) 14:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    It was linked from the band's discography page, which I changed before nominating this for deletion. That was the only place that linked to it, so I could see that being responsible for the few views per day the old title received. —Torchiest talkedits 19:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Possibly, but it's far too soon to know whether that is the only place that the hits were arriving from. Your change will not have affected external sites linking to it, nor bookmarks. Mirrors also take time to catch up. If a few months after this nomination closes it's getting no hits then we can reconsider, but as keeping it is doing no harm there is little to no benefit in bothering. Thryduulf (talk) 12:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.