Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 January 27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 27[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 27, 2013

Good article[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as re-created page. Original discussion was at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 August 7. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The concept of a "good article" is not Wikipedia specific, and is an improper cross-namespace redirect. Legoktm (talk) 11:35, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • the term was created for quick access, why delete it? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:38, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We already have WP:GA, which is quicker, and better. -- Patchy1 12:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Unnecessary and inappropriate cross namespace redirect. -- Patchy1 12:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete XNR, and the concept of "good article" occurs outside of Wikipedia, where Wikipedia's standard does not make sense. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pig cruelty[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 14:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another user (User:Chrisrus) added an RfD template to this redirect at the end of December 2012, but did not add it to the RfD log. I am adding it to today's log. Their edit summary was: "violates WP:NPOV, so delete or find an article or section on this topic." I am neutral in this discussion. -- Patchy1 00:06, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete doesn't make sense. How does intensive pig farming cover "pig cruelty"? Since when is all forms of pig cruelty related to the target? -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 02:44, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Animal welfare#Farm animals. It isn't a large section, but it seems to be the most relevant content we have. Thryduulf (talk) 01:36, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.