Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 February 20

February 20[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 20, 2013

Geography of the Australian Antarctic Territory[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 18:40, 27 February 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Geography of the Australian Antarctic Territory → Geography of Antarctica (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

This is like redirecting Geography of Mexico to Geography of North America. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 23:29, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep the geography of AAT is covered in the more general article, or it could be retargetted to Australian Antarctic Territory, which contains some geographic information. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's like saying that the Geography of Mexico is covered in the more general Geography of North America article. The Australian Antarctic Territory article doesn't have a geography section. In the absence of a proper target this should be a redlink. Every other Antarctica geography link is ether a redirect to a section that deals specifically with the geography of the territory (not to a more general article) or a is redlink (see Template:Geography of Antarctica). Why should this one differ? Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 01:08, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If we had no article on Geography of Mexico, we would use a redirect to Geography of NA until it was written. Just so here. Even more so, for I am not sure a separate article would ever really be useful DGG ( talk ) 20:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Suzuta[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, without prejudice to recreating as a retarget. Wizardman 19:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suzuta → Naomi Wakabayashi (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Delete Surname for many people redirecting to one person. We should not do this for some obscure actor. 65.92.180.137 (talk) 22:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not mentioned at target, not verifiable. If you want to make a disambiguation for other notable Suzuta's go right ahead. Siuenti (talk) 11:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vague redirect.--Lenticel ^(talk) 01:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The only Suzuta I can find anywhere is textile work listed as a living national treasure in Japan. Unless someone can find something better than that, keep as is. Ego White Tray (talk) 05:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
At least that one mentions the name. Siuenti (talk) 14:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to List of Living National Treasures of Japan (crafts)#Textiles per Ego White Tray. Thryduulf (talk) 14:44, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

போர்த்துகல்[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:57, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

போர்த்துகல் → Portugal (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Delete. Gorobay (talk) 14:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not related to the target. WP:NOTDIC, wikipedia is not a translation dictionary -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 22:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per 65.92. The language of the redirect (Tamil) is not directly related to the target. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:08, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, WP:NOTDIC. --ilaiho (talk) 14:19, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This should absolutely not be speedy deleted. Our speedy deletion criteria is very explicit that nothing in What Wikipedia is not is a reason to speedy delete anything. We can finish the discussion properly. Ego White Tray (talk) 13:36, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per Ilaiho. — TORTOISE WRATH 03:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Metropolitan90.--Lenticel ^(talk) 01:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fumée[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was closed, wrong procedure. This is not a redirect. Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fumée → Fumée (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

delete because small business no longer exists. 70.114.149.3 (talk) 06:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's happening here? The RFD template appears to have been placed on an article, not a redirect. Perhaps the IP intended to get the article deleted, if so Wikipedia:Articles for deletion would be the correct forum, but "no longer exists" is not a valid deletion rationale in my opinion. Siuenti (talk) 12:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close not a redirect -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 22:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

瑞典[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

瑞典 → Sweden (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Delete this redirect from a language not related to the target. Gorobay (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not related to Sweden. WP:NOTDIC wikipedia is not a translation dictionary -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Gorobay. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Lenticel ^(talk) 01:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.