Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 March 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 6[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 6, 2012

Clark, Texas[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Disambiguate —GFOLEY FOUR!— 00:29, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate- There are at least three towns in Texas named Clark: Clark, Texas in Liberty County, Clark, Texas (Dish) in Denton County and Clark, Texas in Van Zandt CountyMaile66 (talk) 20:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

User:WikiVandBot[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep —GFOLEY FOUR!— 00:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of user with changed name. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 17:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep for historical reasons. It may be of some use in case of edit history investigations. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 14:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Turks in the Middle East[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep —GFOLEY FOUR!— 00:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been moved to Turks in the Arab world, the term "in the Middle East" is not an appropiate redirect for the subject in matter (given that Turkey itself can be considered Middle Eastern). Turco85 (Talk) 15:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The article existed at the old title for almost 2 years prior to your pagemove. The new title is better but the redirect from the old title serves to prevent link rot and helps the prior editors and readers find the new location of their content. Rossami (talk) 17:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. We generally keep old redirects for the reasons that Rossami gives; as well, please note that erroneous redirects for which people might search are still appropriate. Even if they haven't previously seen it, we know that people might search for this title simply because an article existed there. Nyttend (talk) 15:40, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: harmless redirect with documented plausibility. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 14:44, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Book:Strange Information[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete —GFOLEY FOUR!— 00:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is, more than anything else, confusing. It was created by a pagemove (move history is preserved in the page history of the target page) but there is no revision that contains any mention of 'Strange Information'. Deletion would not break any incoming links and, since the move took place eight hours after page creation, it is highly unlikely that any external links would be broken. The title is not a likely search string for the target page and the redirect is virtually unused: only eight hits in the last six months, most of them from me. -- Black Falcon (talk) 00:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, easily could have been speedied after the move, and the lack of hits since then shows that it's not a likely search target. Nyttend (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: title is completely irrelevant, history preserved. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 14:46, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_March_6&oldid=1039430935"