Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 March 30

< March 29

March 31 >

March 30

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 30, 2012

Shooter on Яails

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete WP:CSD#G7 at author request. JohnCD (talk) 19:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

• Shooter on Яails → Shoot 'em up (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

As I said in my declined speedy, "no one will ever accidentally type Ya (Cyrillic) when searching for this topic". Axem Titanium (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

• Speedy delete ({{db-author}} is applied) My original intent was for this to be created and protected so that a specific page-move vandal (contribs) wouldn't be able to use this title. So it should be safe to delete now that Willy appears inactive and now that we have a filter for Actions By Users, Such as Edits. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 18:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bingo Players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was discussion moot, page has content now which addresses the concerns that prompted this RfD. Amalthea 18:41, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

• Bingo Players → Tom's Diner (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

1. current danger of surprising result BP->TD 2. alternative target not obvious (suggestion welcome) Widefox (talk) 08:00, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

• No longer a redirect. I'm not sure what's done in this situation. Speedy close? Or just revert the addition of content? – hysteria18 (talk) 13:57, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Black history

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was converted to a disambiguation page. Thryduulf (talk) 08:48, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

• Black history → African-American history (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

While I agree that this redirect should exist, I don't believe it should take us to African-American history. The question is, where should it redirect to? Perhaps it should be a disambiguation to African-American history, Black British etc? Any ideas? Pyrrhus16 01:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

• Dab uh... not exactly the best term to use but it could be converted to a dab of sorts for African-American history, Black British and History of Africa. I usually do the dab on this type of rfd cases but this term is too highly charged for me.--Lenticel ^(talk) 01:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
• Dabify. I think African-American history is probably the likeliest intended target, but there are other relevant articles (Black History Month, Black British, Black History for Action, History of Africa) and U.S.-centrism is to be avoided. – hysteria18 (talk) 14:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
• Dabified. I see where this is going, so I did it. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 18:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.