Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 March 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 1[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 1, 2012

Disney Channel (Kazakhstan)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 19:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't have info about this channel. jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 12:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cryohydrate[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Whouk (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not wikt. Should be a redlink per WP:REDLINK, since the possibility exists for encyclopedic content here. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: per WP:REDLINK. Redlink will increase the chances for an actual article to be written on that location. --lTopGunl (talk) 10:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think a redlink is the best solution in this case. Either restore the deleted version (from 2012 Feb 23) and tag with {{stub}} or replace the current (broken) hard-redirect with the soft-redirect {{wi}}. I'm willing to give the restored stub a chance - we can always convert it back to a soft-redirect if the page is not expanded in a reasonable time. Rossami (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Strike that. The deleted stub was a copyright violation and needs to stay deleted. Rossami (talk) 14:42, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Do you expect that no encyclopedic content can be written? — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:26, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • I am uncertain. When attempting to draft a replacement stub myself, I found no sources that supported more than a mere dictionary definition. It's not my area of expertise, though. I do not know whether an article is possible. I could live with either redlink or {{wi}} until someone does write a proper article. Rossami (talk) 17:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per WP:CSD § G8. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now.--Lenticel (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Discrimination against non-Muslims in Pakistan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about freedom of religion in Pakistan. Though it might discuss if there have been incidents where it has been breached for non Muslims, it doesn't mean that it should be implied that this article is about discrimination of these rights. This is a POV redirect. lTopGunl (talk) 08:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This was not a POV fork, rather created as a redirect. [1] --lTopGunl (talk) 12:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I know. The idea is the same, actually: this page redirects from non-neutral title to a neutral one. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The redirect fits within a couple of point of Wikipedia:REDIRECT#Purposes_of_redirects, and doesn't hit any of the major reasons for deletion. Also per Czarkoff's comment above. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the stats show one or two hits a day so there is little use of redirect which is an unlikely search term. However it has been around since 2005 so it will be deep in the mirrors so possible links from external sources. While its not an exact match the target is close enough by redirect standards.--Salix (talk): 22:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_March_1&oldid=1076509148"