Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 January 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 24[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 24, 2012

BE TOGETHER[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep, Procedural close --Lenticel (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

*BE TOGETHER → Be Together (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Procedural re-nomination for a malformed RfD at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 January 22. Original RfD explanation was "delete, apparantly this is a remainder from a discussion some years ago, not useful as redirect" by User:Dinsdagskind Lenticel (talk) 08:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BE TOGETHER is OK to me. The redirect I nominated was Real title: BE TOGETHER
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Christina Ager[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Speedy Delete, G5 by User:NawlinWiki. Lenticel (talk) 03:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo, no discernible relationship to The Fresh Beat Band. RJaguar3 | u | t 05:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Castle Hill Primary School[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to List of schools in Bolton Lenticel (talk) 01:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The target article makes no mention of this school whatsoever. Confusing due to vague suggestion that school is in Bolton but with nothing to verify this. This is practically an Easter egg.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tenebrae (talk • contribs)

  • Keep. I note that there is some content on this school in the history. Not much, but perhaps enough that it should be kept. Do we have to have this jargon like "Easter egg" in these discussions. They just make readers think we are weird. --Bduke (Discussion) 02:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to List of schools in Bolton. TimBentley (talk) 19:01, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Agree. Sounds like an excellent idea. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Castle hill primary school[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to List of schools in Bolton Lenticel (talk) 01:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The target article makes no mention of this school whatsoever. Confusing due to vague suggestion that school is in Bolton but with nothing to verify this. This is practically an Easter egg Tenebrae (talk) 01:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    • Agree. Sounds like an excellent idea. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Real title: BE TOGETHER[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Salix (talk): 11:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural re-nomination for a malformed RfD at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 January 22. Original RfD explanation was "delete, apparantly this is a remainder from a discussion some years ago, not useful as redirect" by User:Dinsdagskind. This was the redirect I was referring to (see above). Dinsdagskind (talk) 13:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Real title: THANK YOU 4 EVERY DAY EVERY BODY[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete--Salix (talk): 11:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also nominate this one, because of the "real title" part. Dinsdagskind (talk) 13:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_January_24&oldid=1039429972"