Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 December 8

December 8[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 8, 2012

Union City High School (future)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 11:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Union City High School (future) → Union City High School (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Probably non-controversial deletion: Disambiguation name that was only briefly used, and has not been a valid disambiguator for 4 years. Closeapple (talk) 05:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, this was for what is now Union City High School (New Jersey), which opened in 2009. --Closeapple (talk) 05:04, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The school has been open for a few years already and there seems to be little likelihood that anyone would be using this redirect. Alansohn (talk) 23:04, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redirect to a disambig page with no indication of the correct school. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kelladros[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. There is no consensus that this was created as an attack page, but no evidence of a connection between this title and the target has been found. Thryduulf (talk) 11:20, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kelladros → Fire and Faggot Parliament (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Someone made this page to insult someone and for no other reason. ζompuλacker (tlk) 05:49, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I too love baseless accusations based on exactly zero evidence... Which person did I allegedly insult by creating this article? What's this person's name, how is it in an insult to this person, and where in the link to this person's existence? ThanksSima Yi (talk) 06:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably whoever "Kelladros" is. In any case, how exactly is this related to the 1414 parliament? GailTheOx (talk) 07:08, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, Delete. I can't find anything backing the assertion that this is a Breton name for this parliament. GailTheOx (talk) 07:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as likely attack page on whomever Mr/Mrs Kelladros is. Travelbird (talk) 08:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per G10. Weihang7 (talk) 16:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous. Why is there an assumption that this is a person's name? I have never heard this used as a person's name before. I asked for evidence and this CompuHacker character suddenly vanished. Sima Yi (talk) 17:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What, pray tell, does it mean, then? I see in edit summaries you've claimed it is a Breton term for the event, but I find no evidence of that. Kelladros, on the other hand, seems to be a fairly common user name on various websites.--Fyre2387 ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You claimed that you did read the edit history so you know what it means, because it was explained there. Your google evidence is qite amusing, although also quite confusing. You're first link shows that no one else has written a page on obscure English history in both Breton and English at the same time. That's nice, although it doesn't prove anything. Your second link is one that you clearly did not examine before you attempted to use it as evidence. For example, many of the links in the "Kelladros" google search link to AUTOGENERATED pages on social aggregate sites such as the Newgrounds link on the very first page. This tells me that you didn't even read the very first page of a link you used as evidence. So your grand evidence that I'm conspiring against some phantom person is that you have autogenerated profile links. Okay... you caught me. This was all a plan to smear and slander the autogenerated robot users of the internet! Actually, it's not. Are we done fishing for excuses to make up for the lack of any real evidence yet? Sima Yi (talk) 20:57, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You claim this is a Breton term. Do YOU have evidence? I never said its not, simply that I've seen no evidence that it is. I do, however, see evidence that at least some people have used it as a username. Some of profiles may be bot generated, but they aren't all. Thus far, the only indicator that this is a Breton term is your word. You need to substantiate your claim. You created the redirect, the burden of proof falls on you.--Fyre2387 ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:30, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.