Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 December 25

< December 24

December 26 >

December 25

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 25, 2012

Crapcom

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted as an attack page (WP:CSD#G10). Thryduulf (talk) 10:19, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

• Crapcom → Capcom (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

I think this page should be deleted since it appears to exist only to disparage the company in question and the term does not exist anywhere in the article. I personally don't agree with all their recent decisions but I don't see this as any way to respond. I am not sure if this would qualify as an attack page but if someone thinks it does I would have no problem with speedy deletion.--64.229.167.20 (talk) 23:10, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

• G10 speedy deletion being attempted. Clearly doesn't need X number of days for this to go through when it's a clear rd meant for disparagement. Nate • (chatter) 02:44, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

The speedy deletion was successful so this should be closed. I personally thought that speedy deletion was a viable option but was not completely sure if it applied so I decided to bring it here first for more imput. I assumed that someone else more experienced with the ctiteria would request it if they believed that it applied.--64.229.167.20 (talk) 05:30, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.