Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 August 16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 16[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 16, 2012

Inductance/Details for some circuit types[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was : With all useful content of this subapge eventually merged back to the original source, the edit history preserved and the orginal editor happily editing the target we can also delete it. Tikiwont (talk) 12:19, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing deletion. This redirected to Inductance with physical symmetry when it was a standalone article; it has now been merged into a section of Inductance. The / name resulted from an improperly formatted spinoff, which was then moved to the "with physical symmetry" article. Now that that has merged back in, this doesn't serve any purpose as a redirect. There are four incoming links, three of which are bot listings and one is on the talk page of Inductance. It's hard to see how this irregularly formatted redirect still serves any purpose. --BDD (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral here. Because the useful attribution history was moved to Inductance with physical symmetry, we don't need this one. However I'm not seeing this qualify for any reasons for deletion, either. Yes, it's kind of bad to have redirects with subpage style, but it's kind of good to keep a redirect at old page titles to point the former contributors to where the article now resides, but neither of those are very compelling in this specific instance. BigNate37(T) 12:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Her Majesty the Queen Sabrina J. Spellman[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:32, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't appear to be constructive. Eeekster (talk) 00:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Hilarious, but pointless. --BDD (talk) 16:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete vague synonym.--Lenticel (talk) 02:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.