Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 April 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 10[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 10, 2012 s page

Keven Veilleux[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 12:39, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article redirects to a list of players with no further information about the subject. This page would be better served as a red link so should the player become notable it will be obvious that the page is missing. DJSasso (talk) 20:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Malleus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:59, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Cross-namespace redirect named for another editor, apparently created to make some kind of point. Not likely to be helpful for people searching the target page. Jafeluv (talk) 12:39, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. this isn't helpful (it will be meaningless to almost everybody) and while I was initially wondering whether this was some form of personal attack (I know the user is a controversial figure, although I don't know the detail), but it seems to be just a civil point being made. Thryduulf (talk) 12:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I concur that this is probably a WP:POINT-violation (though I haven't been able to prove it yet). Rossami (talk) 13:37, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete An in-joke between two users who are friends. See User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum/Archives/2011/November#Courtesy_notification. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 15:03, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per Koavf, an in joke that is now no longer funny. Serves no purpose. Pedro :  Chat  15:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral We might need it just in case anybody scapegoats Malleus again! Jaguar (talk) 20:00, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.