Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 December 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 13, 2011

Republicn Belfast: A Political Tourist's Guide[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_Zero 13:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a plausible typo. Yaksar (let's chat) 08:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: this redirect exists because it's where the article was originally created back in 2009. - Dravecky (talk) 10:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of US Presidents by estimated IQ/Delete[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's implausible to type "/Delete" at the end especially because List of US Presidents by estimated IQ gets ya the same place CTJF83 05:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Giant Bombardon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 19:05, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This redirects to the only page that has a link for it. So it just creates an unnecessary loop. HotshotCleaner (talk) 01:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It is not just an unnecesary loop: redlinks are one way to indicate that content is missing or incomplete, and making it a bluelink disguises that. A redlink would serve other editors (and readers) better. Si Trew (talk) 17:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.