Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 September 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 29[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 29, 2010

CareerEdge.ca[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 00:58, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting the subject's website makes me feel spammy. SnottyWong confabulate 23:35, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

2008/09 UAE Presidents Cup[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Kept. -- JLaTondre (talk) 00:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. These redirects are remnants of pagemoves carried out one year ago, and which (because of the nature of the MediaWiki software) actually are subpages of the articles 2008 and 2009. They are unused (see pageview stats), redundant to other redirects ([1][2]), and contain no unique page history (the move history is preserved in the revision histories of the target articles here and here. -- Black Falcon (talk) 19:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep—harmless. Remember subpages are disabled in article-space; you only see the subpage listings on the talk page, and that's a minor side effect. Plausible-enough search term. Redundancy and lack of history aren't really reasons to delete, although having GFDL-significant history is a reason to keep. –Grondemar 04:52, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep both - some use according to the stats (looking back to July and before since August is currently broken). Searching on the '2008/09 ' formulation is entirely plausible for people not familiar with our naming conventions. Redirects should only be deleted when harmful and these are harmless. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

English, Texas[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Disambiguate. -- JLaTondre (talk) 20:46, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as misleading, as there does not appear to be any place called "English" in the U.S. state of Texas. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Pre-1841 in sports[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 01:00, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, redirect is out of place as there are many pre-1841 in sports articles. Not sure where to properly place this redirect. Maybe you guys can comment on it No Vote Secret account 03:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - the title is now much broader in scope than the target. Confusing. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:46, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete—too broad and arbitrary for a disambiguation page; any retarget will likely be confusing. –Grondemar 04:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – serves no purpose since the decomposition into annual reviews. ----Jack | talk page 07:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Pre-1841 is much more than 1726 to 1775. Armbrust Talk Contribs 13:46, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_September_29&oldid=1138577563"