Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 September 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 26[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 26, 2010

Fred Jones, Jr.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — ξxplicit 00:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible Redirect to scooby doo Character. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 19:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete—I don't believe Fred is supposed to be a "junior". Delete as confusing. –Grondemar 05:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as confusing. There is no mention in the article, that he is a junior. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Genetic origins of the Kurds[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Article restored and nominated at AfD. Non-admin closure. –Grondemar 05:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no mention of the subject in destination article. Spatulli (talk) 18:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore article at this revision and put through XFD if required. Redirecting a problem article then coming here to get the redirect deleted is absolutely the wrong way to go about things. Back-door deleting is never is good idea. What should happen is either to carry out a merge or, if there is nothing mergeable, then the page should be put up for XFD so it can be properly discussed. Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore article and submit at AfD. Admittedly the nominator wasn't the one who changed the article to a redirect, but I agree backdoor deletion by changing an article to a redirect and then nominating it here is always a bad idea. In fact, I think I'll take care of this myself in a moment... –Grondemar 05:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Night time Television[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget all to Late night television. — ξxplicit 00:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Originally pointed to STV Television; doesn't seem like a good target, but I can't think of anything better. Delete unless someone can come up with a good target. JaGatalk 10:52, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wetter (Wetter (Calling You Daddy)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Title of redirect is beyond screwy, implausible search term. What's the likeliness of someone entering the song title twice, in addition to the incorrect amount of parentheses? — ξxplicit 05:55, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete - no need to place here. --JaGatalk 10:57, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as it is an implausible typos and is completely unused. It can not be speedied, because it was not recently created. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'd say this is a time we should let common sense trump the "recently created" rule, but there's no harm waiting. --JaGatalk 16:49, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikipedia:Dr[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think WP:DR should link to a disambiguation page, not redirect to dispute resolution. There are more page views for deletion review than dispute resolution and who knows how many of the dispute resolution views are users looking for deletion review. CTJF83 chat 05:46, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Xiang Ji (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted under CSD G6 (housekeeping) since target is not a disambiguation page.-- JLaTondre (talk) 12:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This dab page is redundant, since there's already Xiang Ji, which redirects to the same page (Xiang Yu) as this. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 04:24, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Ministry of Railways (Soviet Union)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was No longer applicable as converted to a stub. -- JLaTondre (talk) 20:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Ministry of Railways (Soviet Union) should lead to a currently non-existing article People's Commissariat of Railways and not to People's Commissariat for Posts and Telegraphs because it's nothing to do with the early Post Office of the Soviet Union that was transformed later to the Ministry of Telecommunications of the Soviet Union and not to the Ministry of Railways of the Soviet Union. Or it should be a separate article about the Ministry of Railways of the Soviet Union (see for more details Talk:Ministry of Railways (Soviet Union)). WP:RFD#DELETE reasons Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 10 are applicable. --Michael Romanov (talk) 02:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After discussing the issue, Trust Is All You Need is going to create a separate article about the Ministry of Railways of the Soviet Union. --Michael Romanov (talk) 12:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Andrea Bocelli: The Home Video[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Deleted by JamesBWatson per CSD G7 (author request). -- JLaTondre (talk) 20:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The title was a mistake that I made when I started the "Sacred Arias: The Home Video" article a while ago. I don't feel the redirect has any value and should be deleted.--Ahmad123987 (talk) 00:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This can be speedy deleted since you are the author of the page. I've placed a speedy tag on the page. --JaGatalk 08:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Large Hardon Collider[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This really isn't a common misspelling at all (look at the traffic statistics, for example, which are quite meager: [1]). Besides, it's juvenile ("hardon" being a slang term for an erection). Stonemason89 (talk) 00:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep IMO, this is a plausible misspelling. I know I could have spell it this way, being a non-expert in physics. As for the juvenile slang, I think it is just a coincidence.—Chris!c/t 04:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep very plausible mispelling, a simple transposition of two letters, that results in a common word, "hard", as a particle in the phrase. 76.66.200.95 (talk) 05:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - seems plausible enough to me. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Agree with Bridgeplayer, it is plausible. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep—while this is a common juvenile joke as indicated by the nominator, it is also a plausible-enough typo and should be kept. –Grondemar 12:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_September_26&oldid=1140112116"